0 580

Cited 12 times in

BI-RADS Category 3, 4, and 5 Lesions Identified at Preoperative Breast MRI in Patients With Breast Cancer: Implications for Management

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김민정-
dc.contributor.author김은경-
dc.contributor.author문희정-
dc.contributor.author박영진-
dc.contributor.author윤정현-
dc.contributor.author이시은-
dc.contributor.author이지혜-
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-17T01:00:58Z-
dc.date.available2020-06-17T01:00:58Z-
dc.date.issued2020-05-
dc.identifier.issn0938-7994-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/176216-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To investigate outcomes and retrospectively evaluate characteristics of additional lesions initially assessed as BI-RADS category 3, 4, and 5 at preoperative MRI to determine appropriate follow-up management. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 429 lesions other than primary cancer initially assessed as BI-RADS category 3, 4, and 5 at preoperative MRI in 391 patients with breast cancer from March 2012 to December 2013. We investigated their malignancy rate and outcome according to BI-RADS category assessments. We also analyzed clinical and imaging characteristics of each lesion. Pathological results and imaging follow-up of at least 2 years were used as reference standards. Results: Of 429 lesions in 391 patients (mean 48.1 years ± 9.4), the malignancy rate of BI-RADS 3, 4, and 5 lesions was 1.4% (3/213), 17.8% (38/214), and 50% (1/2), respectively. Of BI-RADS 3 lesions or BI-RADS 4 or 5 lesions that were followed up after benign-concordant biopsy (n = 114), two contralateral masses (2/306, 0.7%) were diagnosed as malignancy at 13.3 and 33.2 months after initial detection, within a median follow-up of 63.3 months. None of the NME or foci or lesions followed up after benign-concordant biopsy had a delayed diagnosis of malignancy. Of the 391 patients, 97.4% (381/391) received at least one type of adjuvant therapy. Conclusion: The incidence of delayed cancer diagnosis among additionally detected lesions other than primary cancer is very low and short-term follow-up is unnecessary. Contralateral masses which were not confirmed by biopsy may need annual follow-up. Key points: • 1.4% (3/213) of BI-RADS 3 lesions were malignant including 2 delayed diagnoses after 13.2 months and 33.2 months, and 17.8% (38/214) of BI-RADS 4 lesions and 50% (1/2) of BI-RADS 5 lesions were malignant. • The incidence of delayed diagnosis from additional MRI-detected lesions was very low (0.7%, 2/306) during follow-up, which were all T1N0 contralateral cancer. • Annual follow-up might be adequate for preoperative MRI-detected BI-RADS 3 lesions and BI-RADS 4 lesions followed up after benign-concordant biopsy.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityrestriction-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherSpringer International-
dc.relation.isPartOfEUROPEAN RADIOLOGY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.titleBI-RADS Category 3, 4, and 5 Lesions Identified at Preoperative Breast MRI in Patients With Breast Cancer: Implications for Management-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Radiology (영상의학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSi Eun Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJi Hye Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKyunghwa Han-
dc.contributor.googleauthorEun-Kyung Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMin Jung Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHee Jung Moon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJung Hyun Yoon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorVivian Youngjean Park-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00330-019-06620-y-
dc.contributor.localIdA00473-
dc.contributor.localIdA00801-
dc.contributor.localIdA01397-
dc.contributor.localIdA01572-
dc.contributor.localIdA02595-
dc.contributor.localIdA05611-
dc.contributor.localIdA05168-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ00851-
dc.identifier.eissn1432-1084-
dc.identifier.pmid32006168-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00330-019-06620-y-
dc.subject.keywordBreast neoplasms-
dc.subject.keywordDelayed diagnosis-
dc.subject.keywordFollow-up studies-
dc.subject.keywordMagnetic resonance imaging-
dc.subject.keywordPostoperative period-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Min Jung-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김민정-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김은경-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor문희정-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor박영진-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor윤정현-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor이시은-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor이지혜-
dc.citation.volume30-
dc.citation.number5-
dc.citation.startPage2773-
dc.citation.endPage2781-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationEUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, Vol.30(5) : 2773-2781, 2020-05-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiology (영상의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.