0 553

Cited 22 times in

Comparison Between Perfusion- and Collateral-Based Triage for Endovascular Thrombectomy in a Late Time Window

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김동준-
dc.contributor.author김병문-
dc.contributor.author김영대-
dc.contributor.author김준휘-
dc.contributor.author남효석-
dc.contributor.author한경화-
dc.contributor.author허지회-
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-11T06:23:18Z-
dc.date.available2020-02-11T06:23:18Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.issn0039-2499-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/174656-
dc.description.abstractBackground and Purpose- Perfusion-based triage has proven to be effective and safe for selecting patients who are likely to benefit from endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in a late time window. We investigated collateral-based triage for EVT in patients presenting beyond 6 hours, in terms of interrater reliability and efficacy in predicting clinical outcome, in comparison to perfusion-based triage. Methods- One hundred and thirty-two patients who underwent both computed tomographic angiography and computed tomography perfusion for anterior circulation large artery occlusion 6 to 24 hours after last seen well were enrolled. Patients were classified into EVT-eligible and EVT-ineligible groups according to perfusion- and collateral-based triages. We evaluated the interrater reliability of collateral-based triage and differences in good outcome rates of patients who received EVT in the EVT-eligible groups based on perfusion- and collateral-based triages. Results- Both computed tomographic angiography and computed tomography perfusion were assessable in 93 patients. Seventy-six patients were eligible for EVT according to perfusion-based triage. Among them, EVT was performed in 58, of whom 32 (55.1%) had good outcome. Sixty-nine patients were eligible for EVT based on collateral-based triage. Among them, EVT was performed in 50 patients, of whom 31 (62.0%) had good outcome. Interrater reliability of collateral-based triage was good (generalized κ=0.73 [95% CI, 0.59-0.84]). Agreement on EVT eligibility between perfusion- and collateral-based triages was moderate (κ=0.41 [95% CI, 0.16-0.61]). There was no difference in good outcome rates of patients who underwent EVT in the EVT-eligible groups based on perfusion- and collateral-based triages (55.1% versus 62.0%; P=0.0675). Conclusions- Collateral-based triage showed good interrater reliability and comparable efficacy to that of perfusion-based triage in predicting clinical outcome after EVT in patients presenting beyond 6 hours. Collateral-based triage is a reliable approach for selecting patients for EVT in the extended therapeutic time window.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityrestriction-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkins-
dc.relation.isPartOfSTROKE-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.titleComparison Between Perfusion- and Collateral-Based Triage for Endovascular Thrombectomy in a Late Time Window-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Radiology (영상의학교실)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorByungjun Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorCheolkyu Jung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHyo Suk Nam-
dc.contributor.googleauthorByung Moon Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoung Dae Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJi Hoe Heo-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDong Joon Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJun-Hwee Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKyunghwa Han-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJae Hyoung Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorBeom Joon Kim-
dc.identifier.doi10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.027216-
dc.contributor.localIdA00410-
dc.contributor.localIdA00498-
dc.contributor.localIdA00702-
dc.contributor.localIdA05754-
dc.contributor.localIdA01273-
dc.contributor.localIdA04267-
dc.contributor.localIdA04369-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ02690-
dc.identifier.eissn1524-4628-
dc.identifier.pmid31665993-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.027216-
dc.subject.keywordcomputed tomography angiography-
dc.subject.keywordhumans-
dc.subject.keywordoutcome and process assessment (health care)-
dc.subject.keywordperfusion-
dc.subject.keywordthrombectomy-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Dong Joon-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김동준-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김병문-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김영대-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김준휘-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor남효석-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor한경화-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor허지회-
dc.citation.volume50-
dc.citation.number12-
dc.citation.startPage3465-
dc.citation.endPage3470-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationSTROKE, Vol.50(12) : 3465-3470, 2019-
dc.identifier.rimsid63474-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Research Institute (부설연구소) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Neurology (신경과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiology (영상의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.