Cited 0 times in
연명의료결정법과 의료기관윤리위원회: 현황, 경험과 문제점
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 이일학 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-12-18T01:22:00Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-12-18T01:22:00Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2005-8284 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/173485 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Institutional Ethics Committees are responsible for reviewing, consulting, and educating about matters related to life-sustaining treatment, these committees should play a substantial role in implementing the Act in each hospital. However, there are few such committees and their operations have been limited in many respects. In this article we report on a survey that was carried out to assess the difficulties faced by 63 committee administrators. We also conducted focus-group interviews with seven medical professionals or administrators working in health care institutions in which a committee has been established. Subjects were asked about the difficulties these committees face in advising on foregoing life-sustaining treatment. The operational problems that were reported include the following: difficulties in accessing patients’ records of decisions concerning life-sustaining treatment, obstacles in using Shared Ethics Committees, legal and administrative complexities in diagnosing the end-of-life process, the lack of expertise of committee members and administrators, manpower shortages on the committees, and medical professionals’ negative views of the Act’s procedures for life-sustaining treatment decision-making. In order to deal with these problems, we suggest the following solutions: improving the accessibility of patients’ life-sustaining treatment decisions, encouraging the use of Shared Ethics Committees, defining the qualifications and training requirements for Committee members, establishing better communications among committee members; creating an educational system for medical professionals in order to improve their understanding of the committees’ role; and developing standard operating procedures for the committees. | - |
dc.description.statementOfResponsibility | open | - |
dc.language | Korean | - |
dc.publisher | 한국의료윤리학회 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | Korean Journal of Medical Ethics (한국의료윤리학회지) | - |
dc.rights | CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR | - |
dc.title | 연명의료결정법과 의료기관윤리위원회: 현황, 경험과 문제점 | - |
dc.title.alternative | Institutional Ethics Committees for Decisions on Life-sustaining Treatment in Korea: Their Current State and Experiences with their Operation | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.college | College of Medicine (의과대학) | - |
dc.contributor.department | Dept. of Medical Law and Bioethics (의료법윤리학과) | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | 최지연 | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | 장승경 | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | 김정아 | - |
dc.contributor.googleauthor | 이일학 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.35301/ksme.2019.22.3.209 | - |
dc.contributor.localId | A03063 | - |
dc.relation.journalcode | J02052 | - |
dc.subject.keyword | withholding treatment | - |
dc.subject.keyword | clinical decision-making | - |
dc.subject.keyword | ethics committees | - |
dc.subject.keyword | clinical ethics committees | - |
dc.subject.keyword | ethics consultation | - |
dc.contributor.alternativeName | Lee, Il Hak | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 이일학 | - |
dc.citation.volume | 22 | - |
dc.citation.number | 3 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 209 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 233 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Korean Journal of Medical Ethics (한국의료윤리학회지), Vol.22(3) : 209-233, 2019 | - |
dc.identifier.rimsid | 64549 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.