322 405

Cited 18 times in

Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy for Patients With Heart Failure With Midrange Ejection Fraction: A Patient-Pooled Analysis From the Kor HF and Kor AHF Registries

Authors
 Ki Hong Choi  ;  Jin-Oh Choi  ;  Eun-Seok Jeon  ;  Ga Yeon Lee  ;  Dong-Ju Choi  ;  Hae-Young Lee  ;  Jae-Joong Kim  ;  Shung Chull Chae  ;  Sang Hong Baek  ;  Seok-Min Kang  ;  Byung-Su Yoo  ;  Kye Hun Kim  ;  Myeong-Chan Cho  ;  Hyun-Young Park  ;  Byung-Hee Oh 
Citation
 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, Vol.7(21) : e009806, 2018 
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION
Issue Date
2018
Keywords
aldosterone antagonist ; heart failure with midrange ejection fraction ; medical therapy ; renin‐angiotensin system blocker ; β‐blocker
Abstract
Background Although current guidelines now define heart failure with midrange ejection fraction ( HF mr EF ) as HF with a left ventricular EF of 40% to 49%, there are limited data on response to guideline-directed medical therapy in patients with HF mr EF . The current study aimed to evaluate the association between β-blocker, renin-angiotensin system blocker ( RASB ), or aldosterone antagonist ( AA ) treatment with clinical outcome in patients with HF mr EF . Methods and Results We performed a patient-level pooled analysis on 1144 patients with HF mr EF who were hospitalized for acute HF from the Kor HF (Korean Heart Failure) and Kor AHF (Korean Acute Heart Failure) registries. The study population was divided between use of β-blocker, RASB , or AA to evaluate the guideline-directed medical therapy in patients with HF mr EF . Sensitivity analyses, including propensity score matching and inverse-probability-weighted methods, were performed. The use of β-blocker in the discharge group showed significantly lower rates of all-cause mortality compared with those who did not use a β-blocker (β-blocker versus no β-blocker, 30.7% versus 38.2%; hazard ratio, 0.758; 95% confidence interval, 0.615-0.934; P=0.009). Similarly, the RASB use in the discharge group was associated with the lower risk of mortality compared with no use of RASB ( RASB versus no RASB , 31.9% versus 38.1%; hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.618-0.946; P=0.013). However, there was no significant difference in all-cause mortality between AA and no AA in the discharge group ( AA versus no AA , 34.2% versus 34.0%; hazard ratio, 1.063; 95% confidence interval, 0.858-1.317; P=0.578). Multiple sensitivity analyses showed similar trends. Conclusions For treatment of acute HFmrEF after hospitalization, β-blocker and RASB therapies on discharge were associated with reduced risk of all-cause mortality. Clinical Trial Registration URL : http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT 01389843.
Files in This Item:
T201805927.pdf Download
DOI
10.1161/JAHA.118.009806
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kang, Seok Min(강석민) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9856-9227
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/169512
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links