Prognostic Factors and Scoring Model for Survival in Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer
Authors
Hyung Soon Park ; Ji Soo Park ; You Jin Chun ; Yun Ho Roh ; Jieun Moon ; Hong Jae Chon ; Hye Jin Choi ; Joon Seong Park ; Dong Ki Lee ; Se-Joon Lee ; Dong Sup Yoon ; Hei-Cheul Jeung
Citation
CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, Vol.49(4) : 1127-1139, 2017
PURPOSE: Metastatic biliary tract cancer (mBTC) has a dismal prognosis. In this study, an independent dataset of patients with mBTC was used to implement and validate a routine clinico-laboratory parameter-based scoring model for risk group identification.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From September 2006 to February 2015, 482 patients with mBTC were assigned randomly (ratio, 7:3) into investigational (n=340) and validation datasets (n=142). The continuous variables were dichotomized using a normal range or the best cutoff values determined using the Contal and O'Quigley statistical methods. Following a Cox's proportional hazard model, the scoring model was derived by summing the rounded chi-square scores for the factors identified by multivariate analysis.
RESULTS: The performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 3-4), hypoalbuminemia (< 3.4 mg/dL), carcinoembryonic antigen (≥ 9 ng/mL), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (≥ 3.0), and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (≥ 120 U/mL) were identified as independent prognosticators (Harrell's C index, 0.682; integrated area under the curve, 0.653). Survival was clearly correlated with the risk groups (low, intermediate, and high, 14.0, 7.3, and 2.3 months, respectively; p < 0.001). The prognosis was also discriminative in the validation data set (median survival, 16.7, 7.5, and 1.9 months, respectively; p < 0.001). Chemotherapy did not offer any survival benefits for high-risk patients.
CONCLUSION: These proposed prognostic criteria for mBTC can facilitate accurate patient risk stratification and treatment-related decision-making.