0 596

Cited 109 times in

Breast Cancer Screening With Mammography Plus Ultrasonography or Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Women 50 Years or Younger at Diagnosis and Treated With Breast Conservation Therapy

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김은경-
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-12T05:37:20Z-
dc.date.available2018-10-12T05:37:20Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.issn2374-2437-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/163577-
dc.description.abstractImportance: Younger women (aged ≤50 years) who underwent breast conservation therapy may benefit from breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) screening as an adjunct to mammography. Objective: To prospectively determine the cancer yield and tumor characteristics of combined mammography with MRI or ultrasonography screening in women who underwent breast conservation therapy for breast cancers and who were 50 years or younger at initial diagnosis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter, prospective, nonrandomized study was conducted from December 1, 2010, to January 31, 2016, at 6 academic institutions. Seven hundred fifty-four women who were 50 years or younger at initial diagnosis and who had undergone breast conservation therapy for breast cancer were recruited to participate in the study. Reference standard was defined as a combination of pathology and 12-month follow-up. Interventions: Participants underwent 3 annual MRI screenings of the conserved and contralateral breasts in addition to mammography and ultrasonography, with independent readings. Main Outcomes and Measures: Cancer detection rate, sensitivity, specificity, interval cancer rate, and characteristics of detected cancers. Results: A total of 754 women underwent 2065 mammograms, ultrasonography, and MRI screenings. Seventeen cancers were diagnosed, and most of the detected cancers (13 of 17 [76%]) were stage 0 or stage 1. Overall cancer detection rate (8.2 vs 4.4 per 1000; P = .003) or sensitivity (100% vs 53%; P = .01) of mammography with MRI was higher than that of mammography alone. After the addition of ultrasonography, the cancer detection rate was higher than that by mammography alone (6.8 vs 4.4 per 1000; P = .03). The specificity of mammography with MRI or ultrasonography was lower than that by mammography alone (87% or 88% vs 96%; P < .001). No interval cancer was found. Conclusions and Relevance: After breast conservation therapy in women 50 years or younger, the addition of MRI to annual mammography screening improves detection of early-stage but biologically aggressive breast cancers at acceptable specificity. Results from this study can inform patient decision making on screening methods after breast conservation therapy.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityrestriction-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherAmerican Medical Association-
dc.relation.isPartOfJAMA ONCOLOGY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.subject.MESHAdult-
dc.subject.MESHAge Factors-
dc.subject.MESHBiopsy-
dc.subject.MESHBreast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging*-
dc.subject.MESHBreast Neoplasms/pathology-
dc.subject.MESHBreast Neoplasms/surgery*-
dc.subject.MESHCarcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/diagnostic imaging*-
dc.subject.MESHCarcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/pathology-
dc.subject.MESHCarcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/surgery*-
dc.subject.MESHEarly Detection of Cancer/methods*-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHMagnetic Resonance Imaging*-
dc.subject.MESHMammography*-
dc.subject.MESHMastectomy, Segmental*-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHMultimodal Imaging-
dc.subject.MESHNeoplasm Staging-
dc.subject.MESHPredictive Value of Tests-
dc.subject.MESHProspective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHReproducibility of Results-
dc.subject.MESHRepublic of Korea-
dc.subject.MESHRisk Factors-
dc.subject.MESHTime Factors-
dc.subject.MESHTreatment Outcome-
dc.subject.MESHUltrasonography, Mammary*-
dc.titleBreast Cancer Screening With Mammography Plus Ultrasonography or Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Women 50 Years or Younger at Diagnosis and Treated With Breast Conservation Therapy-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Radiology-
dc.contributor.googleauthorNariya Cho-
dc.contributor.googleauthorWonshik Han-
dc.contributor.googleauthorBoo-Kyung Han-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMin Sun Bae-
dc.contributor.googleauthorEun Sook Ko-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSeok Jin Nam-
dc.contributor.googleauthorEun Young Chae-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJong Won Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSung Hun Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorBong Joo Kang-
dc.contributor.googleauthorByung Joo Song-
dc.contributor.googleauthorEun-Kyung Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHee Jung Moon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSeung Il Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSun Mi Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorEunyoung Kang-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYunhee Choi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHak Hee Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorWoo Kyung Moon-
dc.identifier.doi10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.1256-
dc.contributor.localIdA00801-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ02919-
dc.identifier.eissn2374-2445-
dc.identifier.pmid28655029-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaoncology/fullarticle/2633184-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Eun Kyung-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Eun-Kyung-
dc.citation.volume3-
dc.citation.number11-
dc.citation.startPage1495-
dc.citation.endPage1502-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJAMA ONCOLOGY, Vol.3(11) : 1495-1502, 2017-
dc.identifier.rimsid58843-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiology (영상의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.