0 70

Cited 1 times in

Comparison of the Distribution of Lenticule Decentration Following SMILE by Subjective Patient Fixation or Triple Marking Centration

 David Sung Yong Kang, MD  ;  Hun Lee, MD  ;  Dan Z. Reinstein, MD, MA(Cantab), FRCSC  ;  Cynthia J. Roberts, PhD  ;  Samuel Arba-Mosquera, PhD  ;  Timothy J. Archer, PhD  ;  Eung Kweon Kim, MD, PhD  ;  Kyoung Yul Seo, MD, PhD  ;  Tae-im Kim 
 Journal of Refractive Surgery, Vol.34(7) : 446-452, 2018 
Journal Title
 Journal of Refractive Surgery 
Issue Date
Aberrometry ; Adult ; Anatomic Landmarks ; Astigmatism/surgery ; Corneal Stroma/pathology* ; Corneal Stroma/surgery ; Corneal Surgery, Laser/methods* ; Corneal Topography ; Corneal Wavefront Aberration/physiopathology ; Female ; Humans ; Lasers, Excimer/therapeutic use ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Myopia/surgery* ; Postoperative Complications* ; Refraction, Ocular/physiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Visual Acuity/physiology ; Young Adult
PURPOSE: To investigate lenticule decentration following small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) via the subjective patient fixation method or triple marking centration method and compare inductions of corneal higher order aberrations (HOAs) between the two methods. METHODS: This study analyzed decentration values obtained from the Keratron Scout (Optikon, Rome, Italy) tangential topography difference map of 110 eyes (110 patients) undergoing SMILE with the subjective patient fixation method (n = 55) or triple marking centration method (n = 55). Root mean square values of total HOAs, 3rd order coma aberration, and 4th order spherical aberration, as well as individual coefficients for vertical and horizontal coma, were measured preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. Relationships between the magnitudes of decentration and induced corneal HOAs were assessed. RESULTS: There were significant differences in horizontal decentered displacement (P = .048), vertical decentered displacement (P = .002), and total decentered displacement (P = .001) between the two groups. Total HOAs, coma, vertical coma, and spherical aberration significantly increased in the subjective patient fixation method (all P < .001), whereas total HOAs (P = .002) and vertical coma (P = .005) increased in the triple marking centration method. Induction of total HOAs (mean values: 0.13 vs 0.07; P = .026), coma (0.09 vs 0.03; P = .032), and spherical aberration (0.08 vs 0.02; P = .013) was significantly greater in the subjective patient fixation method than in the triple marking centration method. Association between the total decentered displacement and induced vertical coma (P = .006) or induced spherical aberration (P = .018) was significant in the subjective patient fixation method. CONCLUSIONS: SMILE with the triple marking centration method can yield improved treatment centration and smaller induction of total HOAs, coma, and spherical aberrations. [J Refract Surg. 2018;34(7):446-452.].
Appears in Collections:
1. Journal Papers (연구논문) > 1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Ophthalmology (안과학교실)
Yonsei Authors
김응권(Kim, Eung Kweon) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1453-8042
김태임(Kim, Tae Im) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6414-3842
서경률(Seo, Kyuong Yul) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9855-1980
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
사서에게 알리기


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.