0 187

Cited 4 times in

Randomized, controlled clinical two-centre study using xenogeneic block grafts loaded with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 or autogenous bone blocks for lateral ridge augmentation

Authors
 Daniel S Thoma  ;  Michael Payer  ;  Norbert Jakse  ;  Stefan P Bienz  ;  Jurg Husler  ;  Patrick R Schmidlin  ;  Ui-Won Jung  ;  Christoph H F Hammerle  ;  Ronald E Jung 
Citation
 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, Vol.45(2) : 265-276, 2018 
Journal Title
 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY 
ISSN
 0303-6979 
Issue Date
2018
Keywords
autogenous bone block ; bone morphogenetic protein-2 (MeSH terms) ; bone regeneration ; dental implants ; guided bone regeneration
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To test whether or not the use of a xenogeneic block loaded with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) results in different bone quantity and quality compared to an autogenous bone block. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients with insufficient bone volume for implant placement were randomly assigned to two treatment modalities: a xenogeneic bone block loaded with rhBMP-2 (test) and an autogenous bone block (control). The horizontal ridge width was evaluated prior to augmentation, after augmentation and at 4 months. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were assessed at suture removal and at 4 months. Biopsies were obtained at 4 months and histologically evaluated. Intergroup comparisons were tested by a two-sided Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test, intra-group comparisons were performed with Wilcoxon-signed rank test, and all categorical variables were tested with Chi-squared tests. RESULTS: One autogenous bone block failed. This patient was replaced, and in all subsequently treated 24 patients, implant placement was possible 4 months later. The median ridge width increased from 4.0 mm (Q1 = 2.0; Q3 = 4.0) (test) and 2.0 mm (Q1 = 2.0; Q3 = 3.0) (control) to 7.0 mm (Q1 = 6.0; Q3 = 8.0) (test) and 7.0 mm (Q1 = 6.0; Q3 = 8.0) (control) at 4 months (intergroup p > .05). A higher morbidity was reported at the augmented site in the control group during surgery. Sensitivity was more favourable in the test than that in the control group at 4 months. The biopsies revealed more mineralized tissue in the control group (p < .0043). CONCLUSIONS: Both treatment modalities were successful in regenerating bone to place dental implants. PROMs did not reveal any significant differences between the groups except for pain during surgery at the recipient site (in favour of the test group). Histologically, a higher amount of mineralized tissue was observed for the control group at 4 months.
Full Text
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jcpe.12841
DOI
10.1111/jcpe.12841
Appears in Collections:
2. College of Dentistry (치과대학) > Dept. of Periodontics (치주과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Jung, Ui Won(정의원) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6371-4172
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/161896
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links