424 485

Cited 2547 times in

Osimertinib or Platinum-Pemetrexed in EGFR T790M-Positive Lung Cancer

Authors
 T.S. Mok  ;  Y.-L. Wu  ;  M.-J. Ahn  ;  M.C. Garassino  ;  H.R. Kim  ;  S.S. Ramalingam  ;  F.A. Shepherd  ;  Y. He  ;  H. Akamatsu  ;  W.S.M.E. Theelen  ;  C.K. Lee  ;  M. Sebastian  ;  A. Templeton  ;  H. Mann, M.  ;  Marotti, S. Ghiorghiu  ;  V.A. Papadimitrakopoulou 
Citation
 NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, Vol.376(7) : 629-640, 2017 
Journal Title
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
ISSN
 0028-4793 
Issue Date
2017
MeSH
Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy ; Disease-Free Survival ; Female ; Humans ; Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Mutation ; Pemetrexed/administration & dosage ; Pemetrexed/adverse effects ; Piperazines/administration & dosage ; Piperazines/adverse effects ; Platinum/administration & dosage ; Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor/antagonists & inhibitors ; Young Adult
Abstract
BACKGROUND:

Osimertinib is an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) that is selective for both EGFR-TKI sensitizing and T790M resistance mutations in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. The efficacy of osimertinib as compared with platinum-based therapy plus pemetrexed in such patients is unknown.

METHODS:

In this randomized, international, open-label, phase 3 trial, we assigned 419 patients with T790M-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, who had disease progression after first-line EGFR-TKI therapy, in a 2:1 ratio to receive either oral osimertinib (at a dose of 80 mg once daily) or intravenous pemetrexed (500 mg per square meter of body-surface area) plus either carboplatin (target area under the curve, 5 [AUC5]) or cisplatin (75 mg per square meter) every 3 weeks for up to six cycles; maintenance pemetrexed was allowed. In all the patients, disease had progressed during receipt of first-line EGFR-TKI therapy. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival.

RESULTS:

The median duration of progression-free survival was significantly longer with osimertinib than with platinum therapy plus pemetrexed (10.1 months vs. 4.4 months; hazard ratio; 0.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23 to 0.41; P<0.001). The objective response rate was significantly better with osimertinib (71%; 95% CI, 65 to 76) than with platinum therapy plus pemetrexed (31%; 95% CI, 24 to 40) (odds ratio for objective response, 5.39; 95% CI, 3.47 to 8.48; P<0.001). Among 144 patients with metastases to the central nervous system (CNS), the median duration of progression-free survival was longer among patients receiving osimertinib than among those receiving platinum therapy plus pemetrexed (8.5 months vs. 4.2 months; hazard ratio, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.49). The proportion of patients with adverse events of grade 3 or higher was lower with osimertinib (23%) than with platinum therapy plus pemetrexed (47%).

CONCLUSIONS:

Osimertinib had significantly greater efficacy than platinum therapy plus pemetrexed in patients with T790M-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (including those with CNS metastases) in whom disease had progressed during first-line EGFR-TKI therapy. (Funded by AstraZeneca; AURA3 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02151981 .).
Files in This Item:
T201702570.pdf Download
DOI
10.1056/NEJMoa1612674
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Hye Ryun(김혜련) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1842-9070
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/160525
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links