437 521

Cited 2643 times in

Osimertinib or Platinum-Pemetrexed in EGFR T790M-Positive Lung Cancer

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김혜련-
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-20T07:47:27Z-
dc.date.available2018-07-20T07:47:27Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.issn0028-4793-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/160525-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Osimertinib is an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) that is selective for both EGFR-TKI sensitizing and T790M resistance mutations in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. The efficacy of osimertinib as compared with platinum-based therapy plus pemetrexed in such patients is unknown. METHODS: In this randomized, international, open-label, phase 3 trial, we assigned 419 patients with T790M-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, who had disease progression after first-line EGFR-TKI therapy, in a 2:1 ratio to receive either oral osimertinib (at a dose of 80 mg once daily) or intravenous pemetrexed (500 mg per square meter of body-surface area) plus either carboplatin (target area under the curve, 5 [AUC5]) or cisplatin (75 mg per square meter) every 3 weeks for up to six cycles; maintenance pemetrexed was allowed. In all the patients, disease had progressed during receipt of first-line EGFR-TKI therapy. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. RESULTS: The median duration of progression-free survival was significantly longer with osimertinib than with platinum therapy plus pemetrexed (10.1 months vs. 4.4 months; hazard ratio; 0.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23 to 0.41; P<0.001). The objective response rate was significantly better with osimertinib (71%; 95% CI, 65 to 76) than with platinum therapy plus pemetrexed (31%; 95% CI, 24 to 40) (odds ratio for objective response, 5.39; 95% CI, 3.47 to 8.48; P<0.001). Among 144 patients with metastases to the central nervous system (CNS), the median duration of progression-free survival was longer among patients receiving osimertinib than among those receiving platinum therapy plus pemetrexed (8.5 months vs. 4.2 months; hazard ratio, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.49). The proportion of patients with adverse events of grade 3 or higher was lower with osimertinib (23%) than with platinum therapy plus pemetrexed (47%). CONCLUSIONS: Osimertinib had significantly greater efficacy than platinum therapy plus pemetrexed in patients with T790M-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (including those with CNS metastases) in whom disease had progressed during first-line EGFR-TKI therapy. (Funded by AstraZeneca; AURA3 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02151981 .).-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherMassachusetts Medical Society-
dc.relation.isPartOfNEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.subject.MESHAdult-
dc.subject.MESHAged-
dc.subject.MESHAged, 80 and over-
dc.subject.MESHAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects-
dc.subject.MESHAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use-
dc.subject.MESHCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy-
dc.subject.MESHDisease-Free Survival-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHLung Neoplasms/drug therapy-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHMutation-
dc.subject.MESHPemetrexed/administration & dosage-
dc.subject.MESHPemetrexed/adverse effects-
dc.subject.MESHPiperazines/administration & dosage-
dc.subject.MESHPiperazines/adverse effects-
dc.subject.MESHPlatinum/administration & dosage-
dc.subject.MESHReceptor, Epidermal Growth Factor/antagonists & inhibitors-
dc.subject.MESHYoung Adult-
dc.titleOsimertinib or Platinum-Pemetrexed in EGFR T790M-Positive Lung Cancer-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Internal Medicine-
dc.contributor.googleauthorT.S. Mok-
dc.contributor.googleauthorY.-L. Wu-
dc.contributor.googleauthorM.-J. Ahn-
dc.contributor.googleauthorM.C. Garassino-
dc.contributor.googleauthorH.R. Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorS.S. Ramalingam-
dc.contributor.googleauthorF.A. Shepherd-
dc.contributor.googleauthorY. He-
dc.contributor.googleauthorH. Akamatsu-
dc.contributor.googleauthorW.S.M.E. Theelen-
dc.contributor.googleauthorC.K. Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorM. Sebastian-
dc.contributor.googleauthorA. Templeton-
dc.contributor.googleauthorH. Mann, M.-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMarotti, S. Ghiorghiu-
dc.contributor.googleauthorV.A. Papadimitrakopoulou-
dc.identifier.doi10.1056/NEJMoa1612674-
dc.contributor.localIdA01166-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ02371-
dc.identifier.eissn1533-4406-
dc.identifier.pmid27959700-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Hye Ryun-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Hye Ryun-
dc.citation.volume376-
dc.citation.number7-
dc.citation.startPage629-
dc.citation.endPage640-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationNEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, Vol.376(7) : 629-640, 2017-
dc.identifier.rimsid44259-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.