0 752

Cited 18 times in

PI-RADS version 2: quantitative analysis aids reliable interpretation of diffusion-weighted imaging for prostate cancer

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author나군호-
dc.contributor.author박성윤-
dc.contributor.author신수진-
dc.contributor.author오영택-
dc.contributor.author정대철-
dc.contributor.author조남훈-
dc.contributor.author최영득-
dc.contributor.author홍성준-
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-20T07:41:51Z-
dc.date.available2018-07-20T07:41:51Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.issn0938-7994-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/160434-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: To determine whether apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) ratio aids reliable interpretation of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS: Seventy-six consecutive patients with PCa who underwent DWI and surgery were included. Based on pathologic tumour location, two readers independently performed DWI scoring according to the revised Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADSv2). ADC ratios of benign to cancerous prostatic tissue were then measured independently and compared between cases showing concordant and discordant DWI scores ≥4. Area under the curve (AUC) and threshold of ADC ratio were analyzed for DWI scores ≥4. RESULTS: The rate of inter-reader disagreement for DWI score ≥4 was 11.8% (9/76). ADC ratios were higher in concordant vs. discordant DWI scores ≥4 (median, 1.7 vs. 1.1-1.2; p < 0.001). For DWI scores ≥4, the AUCs of ADC ratios were 0.970 for reader 1 and 0.959 for reader 2. In patients with an ADC ratio >1.3, the rate of inter-reader disagreement for DWI score ≥4 decreased to 5.9-6.0%. An ADC ratio >1.3 yielded 100% (reader 1, 54/54; reader 2, 51/51) positive predictive value for clinically significant cancer. CONCLUSION: ADC ratios may be useful for reliable interpretation of DWI score ≥4 in PI-RADSv2. KEY POINTS: • The ADC ratio correlated positively with DWI score of PI-RADSv2. • ADC ratio >1.3 was associated with concordant interpretation of DWI score ≥4. • ADC ratio >1.3 was associated with high PPV for clinically significant cancer. • ADC ratio is useful for reliable interpretation of DWI scoring in PI-RADSv2.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityrestriction-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherSpringer International-
dc.relation.isPartOfEUROPEAN RADIOLOGY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.subject.MESHAged-
dc.subject.MESHAged, 80 and over-
dc.subject.MESHDiffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods*-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHNeoplasm Staging*-
dc.subject.MESHProstate/pathology*-
dc.subject.MESHProstatic Neoplasms/diagnosis*-
dc.subject.MESHReproducibility of Results-
dc.subject.MESHRetrospective Studies-
dc.titlePI-RADS version 2: quantitative analysis aids reliable interpretation of diffusion-weighted imaging for prostate cancer-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Urology-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSung Yoon Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSu-Jin Shin-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDae Chul Jung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorNam Hoon Cho-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoung Deuk Choi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKoon Ho Rha-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSung Joon Hong-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYoung Taik Oh-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00330-016-4678-7-
dc.contributor.localIdA01227-
dc.contributor.localIdA01509-
dc.contributor.localIdA04596-
dc.contributor.localIdA02390-
dc.contributor.localIdA03592-
dc.contributor.localIdA03812-
dc.contributor.localIdA04111-
dc.contributor.localIdA04402-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ00851-
dc.identifier.eissn1432-1084-
dc.identifier.pmid27957637-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00330-016-4678-7-
dc.subject.keywordApparent diffusion coefficient-
dc.subject.keywordDiffusion-weighted imaging-
dc.subject.keywordMRI-
dc.subject.keywordPI-RADS-
dc.subject.keywordProstate cancer-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameRha, Koon Ho-
dc.contributor.alternativeNamePark, Sung Yoon-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameShin, Su Jin-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameOh, Young Taik-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameJung, Dae Chul-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameCho, Nam Hoon-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameChoi, Young Deuk-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameHong, Sung Joon-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorRha, Koon Ho-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorPark, Sung Yoon-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorShin, Su Jin-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorOh, Young Taik-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorJung, Dae Chul-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorCho, Nam Hoon-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorChoi, Young Deuk-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorHong, Sung Joon-
dc.citation.volume27-
dc.citation.number7-
dc.citation.startPage2776-
dc.citation.endPage2783-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationEUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, Vol.27(7) : 2776-2783, 2017-
dc.identifier.rimsid40603-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Pathology (병리학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiology (영상의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Urology (비뇨의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.