0 618

Cited 14 times in

High-flow haemangiomas versus hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma showing "pseudo-washout" on gadoxetic acid-enhanced hepatic MRI: value of diffusion-weighted imaging in the differential diagnosis of small lesions

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김주희-
dc.contributor.author남세진-
dc.contributor.author유정식-
dc.contributor.author정재준-
dc.contributor.author조은석-
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-02T08:21:17Z-
dc.date.available2017-11-02T08:21:17Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.issn0009-9260-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/154372-
dc.description.abstractAIM: To validate the usefulness of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in the differentiation of high-flow haemangiomas showing pseudo-washout appearance on gadoxetic acid-enhanced hepatic MRI from small hypervascular hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: DWI (b=50, 800 s/mm2) with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps for 50 haemangiomas (6.4±2.9 mm) showing intense enhancement on arterial dominant phase imaging and hypointensity on transitional and/or hepatobiliary phase imaging during gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI were retrospectively analysed and compared with that of 113 hypervascular HCCs (12.8±3.7 mm). In addition to measurement of mean ADC values on DWI and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) on corresponding T2-weighted imaging, qualitative analysis of DWI was performed for each lesion by two independent observers using a five-point scale. RESULTS: Both of mean ADC value (1.902 versus 0.997×10-3 mm2/s) and mean CNR (119.2 versus 36.9) for haemangioma were significantly larger than for HCC (p<0.001). On receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.995 for ADC values was significantly larger than 0.915 for CNRs (p=0.002). When the ADC value of 1.327×10-3 mm2/s was used as the threshold for the diagnosis of haemangioma, the sensitivity and specificity were 98% and 97.3%, respectively. The mean sensitivity and specificity of qualitative analysis for the differentiation of haemangioma from HCC were 92% and 99.1%, respectively. CONCLUSION: For high-flow small haemangiomas showing pseudo-washout appearance during gadoxetic acid-enhanced hepatic MRI, high b-factor DWI including an ADC map may provide additional information to enhance the confidence to exclude small hypervascular HCCs.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityrestriction-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherBlackwell Scientific Publications Ltd-
dc.relation.isPartOfCLINICAL RADIOLOGY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.subject.MESHAdult-
dc.subject.MESHAged-
dc.subject.MESHAged, 80 and over-
dc.subject.MESHCarcinoma, Hepatocellular/diagnostic imaging*-
dc.subject.MESHCarcinoma, Hepatocellular/pathology-
dc.subject.MESHContrast Media-
dc.subject.MESHDiffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods*-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHGadolinium DTPA*-
dc.subject.MESHHemangioma/diagnostic imaging*-
dc.subject.MESHHemangioma/pathology-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHImage Enhancement/methods-
dc.subject.MESHLiver Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging*-
dc.subject.MESHLiver Neoplasms/pathology-
dc.subject.MESHMagnetic Resonance Imaging/methods*-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHNeovascularization, Pathologic/diagnostic imaging-
dc.subject.MESHNeovascularization, Pathologic/pathology-
dc.subject.MESHReproducibility of Results-
dc.subject.MESHSensitivity and Specificity-
dc.titleHigh-flow haemangiomas versus hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma showing "pseudo-washout" on gadoxetic acid-enhanced hepatic MRI: value of diffusion-weighted imaging in the differential diagnosis of small lesions-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.publisher.locationEngland-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Radiology-
dc.contributor.googleauthorS.J. Nam-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJ.-S. Yu-
dc.contributor.googleauthorE.-S. Cho-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJ.H. Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJ.-J. Chung-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.crad.2016.09.020-
dc.contributor.localIdA01255-
dc.contributor.localIdA02500-
dc.contributor.localIdA03712-
dc.contributor.localIdA03881-
dc.contributor.localIdA00951-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ00610-
dc.identifier.eissn1365-229X-
dc.identifier.pmid27789027-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009926016304032-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Joo Hee-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameNam, Se Jin-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameYu, Jeong Sik-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameChung, Jae Joon-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameCho, Eun Suk-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorNam, Se Jin-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorYu, Jeong Sik-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorChung, Jae Joon-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorCho, Eun Suk-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Joo Hee-
dc.citation.titleClinical Radiology-
dc.citation.volume72-
dc.citation.number3-
dc.citation.startPage247-
dc.citation.endPage254-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationCLINICAL RADIOLOGY, Vol.72(3) : 247-254, 2017-
dc.date.modified2017-11-01-
dc.identifier.rimsid42942-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiology (영상의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.