114 70

Cited 2 times in

A Nationwide Retrospective Study of Opioid Management Patterns in 2,468 Patients with Spinal Pain in Korea

Authors
 Sung-Soo Chung  ;  Chun-Kun Park  ;  Kyu-Jung Cho  ;  Kyoung Hyo Choi  ;  Jin-Hyok Kim  ;  Sung-Bum Kim  ;  Sung-Uk Kuh  ;  Jae Chul Lee  ;  Jae Hyup Lee  ;  Kyu-Yeol Lee  ;  Sun-Ho Lee  ;  Seong-Hwan Moon  ;  Si-Young Park  ;  Jae Hang Shim  ;  Byung-Chul Son  ;  Myung Ha Yoon  ;  Hye-Jeong Park 
Citation
 Asian Spine Journal, Vol.10(6) : 1122-1131, 2016 
Journal Title
 Asian Spine Journal 
ISSN
 1976-1902 
Issue Date
2016
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective patient data collection and investigator survey. PURPOSE: To investigate patterns of opioid treatment for pain caused by spinal disorders in Korea. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Opioid analgesic prescription and adequacy of consumption measures in Korea have markedly increased in the past decade, suggesting changing patterns in pain management practice; however, there is lack of integrated data specific to Korean population. METHODS: Patient data were collected from medical records at 34 university hospitals in Korea. Outpatients receiving opioids for pain caused by spinal disorders were included in the study. Treatment patterns, including opioid types, doses, treatment duration, outcomes, and adverse drug reactions (ADRs), were evaluated. Investigators were interviewed on their perceptions of opioid use for spinal disorders. RESULTS: Among 2,468 analyzed cases, spinal stenosis (42.8%) was the most common presentation, followed by disc herniation (24.2%) and vertebral fracture (17.5%). In addition, a greater proportion of patients experienced severe pain (73.9%) rather than moderate (19.9%) or mild (0.7%) pain. Oxycodone (51.9%) and fentanyl (50.8%) were the most frequently prescribed opioids; most patients were prescribed relatively low doses. The median duration of opioid treatment was 84 days. Pain relief was superior in patients with longer treatment duration (≥2 months) or with nociceptive pain than in those with shorter treatment duration or with neuropathic or mixed-type pain. ADRs were observed in 8.6% of cases. According to the investigators' survey, ""excellent analgesic effect"" was a perceived advantage of opioids, while safety concerns were a disadvantage. CONCLUSIONS: Opioid usage patterns in patients with spinal disorders are in alignment with international guidelines for spinal pain management. Future prospective studies may address the suitability of opioids for spinal pain treatment by using appropriate objective measurement tools.
Files in This Item:
T201605789.pdf Download
DOI
10.4184/asj.2016.10.6.1122
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Orthopedic Surgery (정형외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
구성욱(Kuh, Sung Uk) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2566-3209
문성환(Moon, Seong Hwan)
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/153010
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse