Are new criteria for mixed histology necessary for endoscopic resection in early gastric cancer?
Authors
Hong Jin Yoon ; Yong Hoon Kim ; Jie-Hyun Kim ; HyunKi Kim ; Hoguen Kimb ; Jae Jun Park ; Young Hoon Youn ; Hyojin Park ; Jong Won Kim ; Woo Jin Hyung ; Sung Hoon Noh ; Seung Ho Choi
Citation
PATHOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, Vol.212(5) : 410-414, 2016
Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Carcinoma, Signet Ring Cell/pathology* ; Carcinoma, Signet Ring Cell/surgery ; Early Detection of Cancer ; Female ; Gastrectomy* ; Gastroscopy* ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prognosis ; Retrospective Studies ; Stomach Neoplasms/pathology* ; Stomach Neoplasms/surgery
Keywords
Early gastric cancer ; Endoscopic resection ; Lymph node metastasis ; Mixed histology
Abstract
PURPOSE: Early gastric cancer (EGC) of mixed histology is more aggressive than other histologies. In addition, signet ring cell (SRC) mixed histology shows more submucosal invasion and greater lymph node metastasis (LNM). However, there are no criteria for endoscopic resection (ER) in mixed histology. Therefore, this study investigated whether new criteria for mixed histology are necessary for ER in EGC.
METHODS: From January 2005 to December 2012, 3419 patients with EGC underwent surgery. Lesions were classified using three histological classifications: the Japanese classification; World Health Organization (WHO) classification including SRC mixed histology; and Lauren classification. The mixed type in the Lauren classification was also reclassified according to the proportion of differentiated and undifferentiated components. Clinicopathological characteristics were compared according to histological classifications, with special reference to the ER criteria.
RESULTS: With the Lauren classification, 179 (5.3%) lesions were classified as mixed type, including 54 (30.2%) lesions as the differentiated-predominant mixed type. There were 361 (10.6%) lesions classified as SRC mixed histology. Mixed-type lesions in the Lauren classification and SRC mixed lesions were significantly associated with larger size and a greater LNM. Among the lesions meeting the ER criteria, 20 (1.6%) and 55 (4.7%) were categorized as mixed type by the Lauren classification and SRC mixed histology, respectively. However, there was no LNM among the lesions recategorized into mixed histology.
CONCLUSIONS: Mixed histology showed no LNM among the lesions met the present ER criteria. Thus, separate criteria for mixed histology might be not necessary in the criteria for ER in EGC