0 290

Cited 8 times in

Effect of Accommodation on Vaulting and Movement of Posterior Chamber Phakic Lenses in Eyes With Implantable Collamer Lenses

 Hun Lee  ;  David Sung Yong Kang  ;  Byoung Jin Ha  ;  Moonjung Choi  ;  Eung Kweon Kim  ;  Kyoung Yul Seo  ;  Tae-im Kim 
 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, Vol.160(4) : 710-716, 2015 
Journal Title
Issue Date
Accommodation, Ocular/physiology* ; Adult ; Artificial Lens Implant Migration/physiopathology* ; Female ; Humans ; Intraocular Pressure/physiology ; Lens Implantation, Intraocular* ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Myopia/physiopathology ; Myopia/surgery ; Phakic Intraocular Lenses* ; Pupil/physiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Tomography, Optical Coherence ; Visual Acuity/physiology ; Young Adult
PURPOSE: To investigate and compare vaulting and movement changes during accommodation in eyes with the V4c and V4 implantable collamer lenses (ICL). DESIGN: Comparative, observational case series. METHODS: The medical records of 35 eyes (18 patients) with the V4 ICL and 51 eyes (26 patients) with the V4c ICL were retrospectively examined and included in analyses. Anterior chamber depth (ACD), posterior corneal surface-to-ICL distance (endo-ICL distance), pupil size, and postoperative vaulting were evaluated using the Visante anterior chamber optical coherence tomography system. Images were taken during the nonaccommodative and accommodative states 3 months after ICL implantation. Refractive error, keratometry values, axial length, intraocular pressure, and central corneal thickness were evaluated at 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: ICL vaulting did not significantly change during accommodation in eyes with either the V4 or V4c ICL (P = .532 for V4 ICL and P = .415 for V4c ICL). However, significant reductions in ACD, endo-ICL distance, and pupil size were observed during accommodation in both groups. In eyes with a V4 ICL, the change in [Δ] ACD was 0.2 ± 0.1 mm (P < .001), Δendo-ICL distance was 0.2 ± 0.1 mm (P < .001), and Δpupil size was 0.5 ± 0.9 mm (P = .021). For eyes with the V4c ICL, ΔACD was 0.2 ± 0.2 mm (P < .001), Δendo-ICL distance was 0.2 ± 0.2 mm (P < .001), and Δpupil size was 0.8 ± 1.2 mm (P < .001). The mean reductions of each parameter were not statistically different between eyes with the V4 ICL and the V4c ICL. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to the light stimulation response, accommodation does not significantly affect ICL vaulting differently in eyes with either the V4 or V4C ICLs.
Full Text
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Ophthalmology (안과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Eung Kweon(김응권) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1453-8042
Kim, Tae Im(김태임) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6414-3842
Seo, Kyuong Yul(서경률) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9855-1980
Lee, Hun(이훈)
사서에게 알리기


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.