0 675

Cited 5 times in

Prospective randomized trial comparing pushable coil and detachable coil during percutaneous implantation of port-catheter system for hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김경민-
dc.contributor.author김만득-
dc.contributor.author박성일-
dc.contributor.author원정윤-
dc.contributor.author이도연-
dc.contributor.author이신재-
dc.contributor.author원종윤-
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-04T10:59:55Z-
dc.date.available2016-02-04T10:59:55Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.issn0942-8925-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/139441-
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to prospectively compare the efficacy and controllability of pushable coil and detachable coil during embolization of gastroduodenal artery (GDA) while performing percutaneous implantation of port-catheter system for hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy. Fifty patients (M:F = 42:8, age: 31-81 years) with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing port-catheter system implantation were randomized into pushable coil group and detachable coil group. During catheter fixation, GDA was embolized as close to the origin as possible. Success rate, number of coils used, number of coils removed due to malposition after deployment, time to occlusion, uncoiled GDA length, pushability, and complications were compared. Pushability was graded as no tension, slight tension, and difficult to advance. Embolization was successful in 49 patients. One failure resulted from repeated regurgitation of pushable coil into hepatic artery. Number of coils used and removed coils, time to occlusion, and uncoiled GDA length were 1-3 (mean 2.32), 5 coils in 3 patients, 4-20 min (mean 8.00), and 0-15.0 mm (mean 3.36) in pushable coil group, and 1-5 (mean 2.12), 2 coils in 2 patients, 2-15 min (mean 7.40), and 0-10.2 mm (mean 2.92) in detachable coil group, respectively, without significant difference. Pushability was no tension (n = 24) and slight tension (n = 1) in pushable coil group and no tension (n = 16), slight tension (n = 7), and difficult to advance (n = 2) in detachable coil group. One hepatic artery dissection occurred in the failed case during coil removal. Pushable coils and detachable coils had similar efficacy and controllability during GDA embolization, although there was a trend favoring detachable coil.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.format.extent595~600-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherSpringer International-
dc.relation.isPartOfABDOMINAL IMAGING-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.subject.MESHAntineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage*-
dc.subject.MESHCarcinoma, Hepatocellular/drug therapy*-
dc.subject.MESHEmbolization, Therapeutic/instrumentation*-
dc.subject.MESHEquipment Design-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHInfusions, Intra-Arterial/methods*-
dc.subject.MESHLiver Neoplasms/drug therapy*-
dc.subject.MESHProspective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHRadiography, Interventional/methods*-
dc.titleProspective randomized trial comparing pushable coil and detachable coil during percutaneous implantation of port-catheter system for hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Radiology (영상의학)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSung II Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorShin Jae Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMyungsu Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMu Sook Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorGyoung Min Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMan Deuk Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJong Yun Won-
dc.contributor.googleauthorDo Yun Lee-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00261-014-0239-1-
dc.admin.authorfalse-
dc.admin.mappingfalse-
dc.contributor.localIdA02443-
dc.contributor.localIdA00296-
dc.contributor.localIdA00420-
dc.contributor.localIdA01510-
dc.contributor.localIdA02718-
dc.contributor.localIdA02944-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ00002-
dc.identifier.eissn1432-0509-
dc.identifier.pmid25214068-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00261-014-0239-1-
dc.subject.keywordInterventional-
dc.subject.keywordEmbolization-
dc.subject.keywordDetachable fibered coil-
dc.subject.keywordGastroduodenal artery-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Gyoung Min-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Man Deuk-
dc.contributor.alternativeNamePark, Sung Il-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameWon, Jong Yun-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameLee, Do Yun-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameLee, Shin Jae-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorWon, Jong Yun-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Gyoung Min-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Man Deuk-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorPark, Sung Il-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLee, Do Yun-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLee, Shin Jae-
dc.rights.accessRightsnot free-
dc.citation.volume40-
dc.citation.number3-
dc.citation.startPage595-
dc.citation.endPage600-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationABDOMINAL IMAGING, Vol.40(3) : 595-600, 2015-
dc.identifier.rimsid55396-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiology (영상의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.