1678 2200

Cited 1 times in

Need to pay more attention to attendance at follow-up consultation after cancer screening in smokers and drinkers

Authors
 Jaeyong Shin  ;  Eun-Cheol Park  ;  Hong-Chul Bae  ;  Seri Hong  ;  Suk-Yong Jang  ;  Jae-Hyun Kim  ;  Jee Suk Chang  ;  Sang Gyu Lee 
Citation
 Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, Vol.16(1) : 109-117, 2015 
Journal Title
 Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention 
ISSN
 1513-7368 
Issue Date
2015
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Follow-up clinical consultations could improve overall health status as well provide knowledge and education for cancer prevention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is the cross-sectional study using the Korean Community Health Survey (KCHS) 6th edition for 2012, with 115,083 respondents who underwent cancer checkups selected as subjects. Associations between the presence of consultation and the socioeconomic status were determined using statistical methods with the SAS 9.3 statistical package (Cary, NC, USA). FINDINGS: Among the recipients, 32,179 (28.0%) received clinical consultations after cancer screenings. Those in rural areas (odds ratio, OR=0.71, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.69-0.73) visited follow-up clinics less frequently than did those in urban areas. Starting at the elementary school level, as the education level increased to middle school (OR=1.26, 95% CI: 1.19-1.34), high school (OR=1.29, 95% CI: 1.23-1.36) or college (OR=1.76, 95% CI: 1.65-1.89), the participation rates also increased. When compared with the lowest quartile group, the quartile income level showed a statistical trend and difference as follows: second lowest quartile (OR=1.11, 95% CI: 1.07-1.16), third lowest (OR=1.12, 95% CI: 1.07-1.17) and highest quartile income (OR=1.29, 95% CI: 1.23-1.35). In addition, the people with economic activities (OR=0.87, 95% CI: 0.84-0.90) visited follow-up clinics less frequently than did the others. Current smokers (OR=0.93, 95% CI: 0.89-0.98) and inveterate drinkers (OR=0.88, 95% CI: 0.85-0.94) had a tendency to visit less often than did non-smokers and other drinkers with all cancers combined. INTERPRETATION: We suggest primary prevention through lifestyle modifications including smoking and drinking, and environmental interventions may offer the most cost-effective approach to reduce the cancer burden.
Files in This Item:
T201500275.pdf Download
DOI
10.7314/APJCP.2015.16.1.109
Appears in Collections:
4. Graduate School of Public Health (보건대학원) > Graduate School of Public Health (보건대학원) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Preventive Medicine and Public Health (예방의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
박은철(Park, Eun-Cheol) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2306-5398
배홍철(Bae, Hong Chul)
신재용(Shin, Jae Yong)
이상규(Lee, Sang Gyu) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4847-2421
장석용(Jang, Suk Yong)
장지석(Chang, Jee Suk Paul) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7685-3382
홍세리(Hong, Se Ri)
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/139349
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse