292 278

Cited 2 times in

Number of positive preoperative biopsy cores is a predictor of positive surgical margins (PSM) in small prostates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP)

Authors
 Patrick H. Tuliao  ;  Kyo C. Koo  ;  Koon H. Rha  ;  Sung J. Hong  ;  Byung H. Chung  ;  Young D. Choi  ;  Chien H. Chang  ;  Christos Komninos 
Citation
 BJU International, Vol.116(6) : 897-904, 2015 
Journal Title
 BJU International 
ISSN
 1464-4096 
Issue Date
2015
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of prostate size on positive surgical margin (PSM) rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and the preoperative factors associated with PSM. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 1229 men underwent RARP by a single surgeon, from 2005 to August of 2013. Excluded were patients who had transurethral resection of the prostate, neoadjuvant therapy, clinically advanced cancer, and the first 200 performed cases (to reduce the effect of learning curve). Included were 815 patients who were then divided into three prostate size groups: <31 g (group 1), 31-45 g (group 2), >45 g (group 3). Multivariate analysis determined predictors of PSM and biochemical recurrence (BCR). RESULTS: Console time and blood loss increased with increasing prostate size. There were more high-grade tumours in group 1 (group 1 vs group 2 and group 3, 33.9% vs 25.1% and 25.6%, P = 0.003 and P = 0.005). PSM rates were higher in prostates of <45 g with preoperative PSA levels of >20 ng/dL, Gleason score ≥7, T3 tumour, and ≥3 positive biopsy cores. In group 1, preoperative stage T3 [odds ratio (OR) 3.94, P = 0.020] and ≥3 positive biopsy cores (OR 2.52, P = 0.043) were predictive of PSM, while a PSA level of >20 ng/dL predicted the occurrence of BCR (OR 5.34, P = 0.021). No preoperative factors predicted PSM or BCR for groups 2 and 3. CONCLUSION: A preoperative biopsy with ≥3 positive cores in men with small prostates predicts PSM after RARP. In small prostates with PSM, a PSA level of >20 ng/dL is a predictor of BCR. These factors should guide the choice of therapy and indicate the need for closer postoperative follow-up.
Files in This Item:
T201504744.pdf Download
DOI
10.1111/bju.12888
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Urology (비뇨의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
구교철(Koo, Kyo Chul) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7303-6256
나군호(Rha, Koon Ho) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8588-7584
장첸샹(Chang, Chien Hsiang)
정병하(Chung, Byung Ha) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9817-3660
최영득(Choi, Young Deuk) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8545-5797
크리스토스콤니노스(Komninos, Christos)
툴리아오패트릭(Tuliao, Patrick)
홍성준(Hong, Sung Joon) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9869-065X
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/139105
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse