4. 하부 골유착율은 대조군에서 52.1%, 실험군에서 73.3%로 통계학적인 유의 차를 보였다(P<0.05).
5. 실험군에서 HA와 골조직은 경계를 구별할 수 없는 치밀한 결합양상을 보였다.
HISTOLOGICAL COMPARISONS OF TITANIUM PLASMA SPRAYED IMPLANT AND HYDROXYAPATITE
COATED IMPLANT TO BONE INTERFACE IN PERIODONTALLY INVOLVED EXTRACTION SOCKETS IN
DOGS
Jin-Sook Kim, D.D.S,
Department of Dental Science, Graduate School, Yonsei University
(Directed by Prof. Chong Kwan Kim, D.D.S., M.S.D., Ph D.)
Dental implants have been widely used in the treatment of esthetic and functional
problems of the mouth due to alveolar bone loss, after tooth extraction. The
success of implantation strongly depends on osseointegration. For ogseointegration,
implant material, methodology, and design have been investigated.
For materials, two popular materials at present are titanium and hydroxyapatite.
For methods, immediate implantation is being used recently.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate osseointegration between the unthreaded
cylindrical TPS implant and the HA-coated implant by a histomorphometric analysis.
For this analysis, experimental periodontits was induced on the 3, 4 premolars of
adult dogs by the ligation of orthodontic threads. Thereafter, each tooth was
extracted. TPS. implants and HA-coated implants were immediately inserted in the
extraction socket.
In control group, TPS implants were immediately inserted, and In experimental
group, HA implants were immediately inserted.
The dogs were sacrificed after 12 weeks, then the specimens were prepared for LM
and histomorphometric analysis.
The conclusion of this study is as follows
1. In both control and experimental group, no inflammatory cells were observed.
2. The results of the histomorphometric analysis showed that the total
osseointegration was 48.5% in control group, and 68.8% in experimental group.
The experimental group was higher than the control group, and the difference was
not statistically significant(p<0.05).
3. The results of the histomorphometric analysis skewed that the
osseointegrationin the hole was 40.6% in control group, and 70.2% in experimental
group.
The experimental group was higher than the control group, and the difference was
statistically significant (p<0.05).
4. The results of the histomorphometric analysis showed that the osseointegration
in the lower part was 52.1% in control group, and 73.3% in experimental group.
The experimental group was higher than the control group, and the difference was
statistically significant (p<0.05).
5. In experimental group, the bone to HA interface seemed to be mixed of bone and
HA. We could not distinguish HA from the bone. The HA coating was detached from the
titanium surface.
[영문]
Dental implants have been widely used in the treatment of esthetic and functional problems of the mouth due to alveolar bone loss, after tooth extraction. The success of implantation strongly depends on osseointegration. For ogseointegration,
implant material, methodology, and design have been investigated.
For materials, two popular materials at present are titanium and hydroxyapatite.
For methods, immediate implantation is being used recently.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate osseointegration between the unthreaded cylindrical TPS implant and the HA-coated implant by a histomorphometric analysis.
For this analysis, experimental periodontits was induced on the 3, 4 premolars of adult dogs by the ligation of orthodontic threads. Thereafter, each tooth was extracted. TPS. implants and HA-coated implants were immediately inserted in the extraction socket.
In control group, TPS implants were immediately inserted, and In experimental group, HA implants were immediately inserted.
The dogs were sacrificed after 12 weeks, then the specimens were prepared for LM and histomorphometric analysis.
The conclusion of this study is as follows
1. In both control and experimental group, no inflammatory cells were observed.
2. The results of the histomorphometric analysis showed that the total osseointegration was 48.5% in control group, and 68.8% in experimental group.
The experimental group was higher than the control group, and the difference was not statistically significant(p<0.05).
3. The results of the histomorphometric analysis skewed that the osseointegrationin the hole was 40.6% in control group, and 70.2% in experimental group.
The experimental group was higher than the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (p<0.05).
4. The results of the histomorphometric analysis showed that the osseointegration in the lower part was 52.1% in control group, and 73.3% in experimental group.
The experimental group was higher than the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (p<0.05).
5. In experimental group, the bone to HA interface seemed to be mixed of bone and HA. We could not distinguish HA from the bone. The HA coating was detached from the titanium surface.