1 632

Cited 238 times in

Differentiation of Extrahepatic Bile Duct Cholangiocarcinoma from Benign Stricture: Findings at MRCP versus ERCP

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author박미숙-
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-14T16:42:52Z-
dc.date.available2015-07-14T16:42:52Z-
dc.date.issued2004-
dc.identifier.issn0033-8419-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/111442-
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate criteria for differentiating extrahepatic bile duct cholangiocarcinoma from benign cause of stricture at magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and to compare diagnostic accuracy with this modality versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: MRCP and ERCP images in 50 patients (27 with cholangiocarcinoma [18 men, nine women; mean age, 58 years] and 23 with benign cause of stricture [13 men, 10 women; mean age, 60 years]) were retrospectively reviewed to assess the appearance of bile duct strictures. Final diagnosis was based on surgical or biopsy findings. Strictures were described according to their imaging appearance (irregular or smooth margins, asymmetric or symmetric narrowing, abrupt narrowing or gradual tapering, and presence or absence of double-duct sign). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of MRCP and ERCP were calculated by using ratings of confidence in image-based diagnosis. Lengths of stricture were electronically measured and compared by using the Student t test. RESULTS: Among cholangiographic criteria for malignant biliary stricture, irregular margins and asymmetric narrowing were more common in cholangiocarcinomas (24 [89%] of 27 patients) than in benign strictures (six [26%] and eight [35%] of 23 patients, respectively). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the two methods for differentiation of malignant from benign causes of biliary stricture were 81% (22 of 27), 70% (16 of 23), and 76% (38 of 50), respectively, for MRCP and 74% (20 of 27), 70% (16 of 23), and 72% (36 of 50), respectively, for ERCP. Mean length (+/- standard deviation) of cholangiocarcinomas was 30.0 mm +/- 8.5, and that of benign strictures was 13.6 mm +/- 9.1 (P <.001). CONCLUSION: Accuracy of MRCP is comparable with that of ERCP. Regardless of modality, a lengthy segment of extrahepatic bile duct stricture with irregular margin and asymmetric narrowing suggests cholangiocarcinoma, and a short segment with regular margin and symmetric narrowing suggests benign cause.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.format.extent234~240-
dc.relation.isPartOfRADIOLOGY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.subject.MESHAdult-
dc.subject.MESHAged-
dc.subject.MESHAged, 80 and over-
dc.subject.MESHAlkaline Phosphatase/blood-
dc.subject.MESHBile Duct Diseases/diagnosis*-
dc.subject.MESHBile Duct Diseases/diagnostic imaging-
dc.subject.MESHBile Duct Neoplasms/diagnosis*-
dc.subject.MESHBile Duct Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging-
dc.subject.MESHBile Ducts, Extrahepatic/diagnostic imaging-
dc.subject.MESHBile Ducts, Extrahepatic/pathology*-
dc.subject.MESHBilirubin/blood-
dc.subject.MESHCA-19-9 Antigen/blood-
dc.subject.MESHCholangiocarcinoma/diagnosis*-
dc.subject.MESHCholangiocarcinoma/diagnostic imaging-
dc.subject.MESHCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde*-
dc.subject.MESHConstriction, Pathologic/diagnosis-
dc.subject.MESHConstriction, Pathologic/diagnostic imaging-
dc.subject.MESHDiagnosis, Differential-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHImage Processing, Computer-Assisted-
dc.subject.MESHMagnetic Resonance Imaging/methods*-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHReproducibility of Results-
dc.subject.MESHRetrospective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHSensitivity and Specificity-
dc.titleDifferentiation of Extrahepatic Bile Duct Cholangiocarcinoma from Benign Stricture: Findings at MRCP versus ERCP-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Radiology (영상의학)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMi-Suk Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorTae Kyoung Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHyun Kwon Ha-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMoon-Gyu Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPyo Nyun Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorAh Young Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKyoung Ah Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJean Hwa Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJung-Sun Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJeong Kyung Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSung Won Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKyoung Won Kim-
dc.identifier.doi10.1148/radiol.2331031446-
dc.admin.authorfalse-
dc.admin.mappingfalse-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ02596-
dc.identifier.eissn1527-1315-
dc.identifier.pmid15333766-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://pubs.rsna.org/doi/abs/10.1148/radiol.2331031446-
dc.subject.keywordBile duct radiography, 768.1222 Bile ducts, neoplasms, 768.3212 Bile ducts, stenosis or obstruction, 768.288, 768.294, 768.297 Magnetic resonance (MR)-
dc.subject.keywordcholangiopancreatography-
dc.subject.keyword768.12149-
dc.contributor.alternativeNamePark, Mi Sook-
dc.rights.accessRightsnot free-
dc.citation.volume233-
dc.citation.number1-
dc.citation.startPage234-
dc.citation.endPage240-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationRADIOLOGY, Vol.233(1) : 234-240, 2004-
dc.identifier.rimsid35817-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiology (영상의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.