0 200

Cited 0 times in

Measurement of Contrast Sensitivity and Glare Under Mesopic and Photopic Conditions Following Wavefront-guided and Conventional LASIK Surgery

Authors
 Lee, Hyung Keun  ;  Chul Myung Choe  ;  Kyoung Tak Ma  ;  Eung Kweon Kim 
Citation
 JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY, Vol.22(7) : 647-655, 2006 
Journal Title
 JOURNAL OF REFRACTIVE SURGERY 
ISSN
 1081-597X 
Issue Date
2006
MeSH
Adult ; Astigmatism/surgery ; Contrast Sensitivity/physiology* ; Dark Adaptation ; Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological/standards ; Female ; Glare* ; Humans ; Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ/methods* ; Light ; Male ; Myopia/surgery* ; Postoperative Period ; Prospective Studies ; Pupil/physiology ; Reproducibility of Results ; Treatment Outcome ; Visual Acuity
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare contrast and glare vision in a prospective study of eyes treated using conventional and wavefront-guided LASIK surgery. The reproducibility of a glaremeter device used to quantitatively measure glare and halo was also determined. METHODS: Ninety-two eyes of 46 patients underwent conventional LASIK surgery and 104 eyes of 52 patients underwent wavefront-guided LASIK surgery. Visual acuity, glare disability measured using a glaremeter, and contrast sensitivity assessed using a Pelli-Robson chart were measured monthly for 6 months postoperatively. Glaremeter testing was performed under both mesopic (5.4 +/- 0.4 cd/m2) and photopic (78.3 +/- 4.4 cd/m2) conditions. To evaluate the reproducibility of the glaremeter, 36 eyes of 18 nonoperated myopic patients were tested. RESULTS: The coefficient of variation and the reliability coefficient for the glare test were 13.6% and 95.2%, respectively. The glaremeter showed that glare disability under mesopic conditions differed between conventional and wavefront-guided LASIK eyes over 6-month follow-up (907.5 +/- 491.5 vs 986.1 +/- 448.0 pixels preoperatively and 1717.1 +/- 521.2 vs 1407.8 +/- 411.3 pixels at 6 months, P<.0001). At 6 months, contrast sensitivity log values were 1.62 +/- 0.31 and 1.78 +/- 0.34 for conventional and wavefront-guided LASIK eyes, respectively (P=.010). The visual complaint score was lower in the wavefront-guided LASIK group (P=.0116). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to conventional ablation, wavefront-guided ablation provided superior outcomes in terms of postoperative glare under mesopic conditions, subjective complaints, and contrast sensitivity. In addition, it appears the glaremeter can be used for clinical quantitative evaluation of glare and halo.
Full Text
http://search.proquest.com/docview/236693170?accountid=131089
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Ophthalmology (안과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Eung Kweon(김응권) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1453-8042
Lee, Hyung Keun(이형근) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1123-2136
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/109067
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse