1 468

Cited 20 times in

Cost-utility analysis of cochlear implants in Korea using different measures of utility

Authors
 Hoo-Yeon Lee  ;  Eun-Cheol Park  ;  Han Joong Kim  ;  Jae-Young Choi  ;  Hee-Nam Kim 
Citation
 ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, Vol.126(8) : 817-823, 2006 
Journal Title
ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA
ISSN
 0001-6489 
Issue Date
2006
MeSH
Adult ; Cochlear Implants/economics* ; Cochlear Implants/psychology ; Cost-Benefit Analysis/economics* ; Cross-Cultural Comparison ; Deafness/economics* ; Deafness/psychology ; Deafness/rehabilitation* ; Direct Service Costs/statistics & numerical data ; Female ; Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data* ; Health Status ; Humans ; Korea ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pain Measurement ; Quality of Life/psychology ; Quality-Adjusted Life Years
Keywords
Cochlear implant ; cost-utility analysis ; quality-adjusted life year
Abstract
CONCLUSIONS: All cost-utility ratios obtained using the various measures of utility except quality well-being (QWB) were below 25,000 dollars per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Therefore, treatment of post-lingual deaf adults with cochlear implants improves the quality of life at a reasonable direct cost and appears to produce net savings for Korean society.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the quality of life and the cost consequences of cochlear implants for deaf adults.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a cost-utility analysis using data from 11 post-lingual deaf adults who had received cochlear implants between 1990 and 2002 in Seoul, Korea. The average age of the participants was 49.6 years. The main outcome was the direct cost per QALY calculated using the visual analog scale (VAS), health utility index (HUI), EuroQol (EQ-5D) measure and QWB measure. Costs and utility were discounted 3% annually.

RESULTS: Recipients used implants for an average of 5.6 years. The mean VAS, HUI, EQ-5D, and QWB score increased by 0.33 (from 0.27 before implantation to 0.60 at survey), 0.36 (0.29 to 0.65), 0.26 (0.52 to 0.78), and 0.16 (0.45 to 0.61), respectively. The discounted direct cost was 22,320 dollars, which yielded a cost-utility ratio of 19,223 dollars per QALY using VAS, 17,387 dollars per QALY using HUI, 24,604 dollars per QALY using EQ-5D, and 40,474 dollars per QALY using QWB.
Full Text
http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00016480500525213
DOI
10.1080/00016480500525213
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Otorhinolaryngology (이비인후과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Preventive Medicine (예방의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Han Joong(김한중)
Kim, Hee Nam(김희남)
Park, Eun-Cheol(박은철) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2306-5398
Choi, Jae Young(최재영) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9493-3458
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/109044
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links