1 234

Cited 24 times in

The effect of several dentin desensitizers on shear bond strength of adhesive resin luting cement using self-etching primer.

Authors
 Jung-Bo Huh  ;  Jee-Hwan Kim  ;  Moon-Kyu Chung  ;  Ho-yong Lee  ;  Yong-Geun Choi  ;  June-Sung Shim 
Citation
 JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, Vol.36(12) : 1025-1032, 2008 
Journal Title
 JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY 
ISSN
 0300-5712 
Issue Date
2008
MeSH
Dental Bonding* ; Dentin/drug effects ; Dentin/ultrastructure* ; Dentin Sensitivity/drug therapy* ; Dentin-Bonding Agents/chemistry* ; Glutaral/chemistry ; Humans ; Materials Testing ; Methacrylates/chemistry ; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning ; Oxalates/chemistry ; Oxalic Acid/chemistry ; Resin Cements/chemistry* ; Resins, Plant/chemistry ; Shear Strength ; Stress, Mechanical ; Surface Properties
Keywords
Dentin desensitizer ; Bonding strength ; Resin cement
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Dentin desensitizers can inhibit the bonding between dentin and resin cements. This study examined the effect of the previous application of desensitizers on the shear bond strength of one resin cement using self-etching primer to dentin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and twenty-five dentin exposed teeth were randomly assigned to four experimental groups and one control group of 25 teeth each. Four dentin desensitizers were applied to the four experimental groups, respectively. The dentin desensitizers used were SuperSeal (Phoenix Dental, Inc., USA), MS-Coat (Sun Medical Co. Ltd, Japan), Gluma (Heraeus Kulzer, Germany), and Copalite Varnish (Cooley & Cooley Ltd, USA). Panavia F (Kuraray Co. Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) was attached to the top of each experimental and control group teeth using an Ultradent testing jig (Ultradent Product, Inc., Utah, USA), and the shear bond strength was measured using a Universal testing machine (Model 6022, Instron Co., Canton, MA, USA). The tooth surface was examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JSM-T2000, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). RESULTS: The control group showed the greatest shear bond strength (14.74 MPa) followed by SuperSeal (12.33 MPa), Gluma (5.28 MPa), MS-Coat (4.44 MPa) and Copalite Varnishtrade mark (3.14 MPa). There was no significant difference in shear bond strength between the control group and the experimental group treated with Superseal. The shear bond strength in the other experimental groups treated with Gluma, Varnish, and MS-Coat was similar to each other but significantly lower than control or Superseal. SEM showed revealed resin tags in most of the dentinal tubules in the experimental group treated with the Superseal. CONCLUSION: Among the four dentin desensitizers, Superseal was the only one that did not interfere with the process of resin bonding. The other dentin desensitizers that contained a resin ingredient interfered with resin retention.
Full Text
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300571208002510
DOI
10.1016/j.jdent.2008.08.012
Appears in Collections:
2. College of Dentistry (치과대학) > Dept. of Prosthodontics (보철과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Jee Hwan(김지환) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0872-4906
Shim, June Sung(심준성) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1428-0122
Chung, Moon Kyu(정문규)
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/108224
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links