335 789

Cited 110 times in

Clinical and angiographic follow-up of stent-only therapy for acute intracranial vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysms.

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김동익-
dc.contributor.author김병문-
dc.contributor.author김세혁-
dc.contributor.author박성일-
dc.contributor.author서상현-
dc.contributor.author신용삼-
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-24T16:46:49Z-
dc.date.available2015-04-24T16:46:49Z-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.issn0195-6108-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/104156-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Little has been known about the clinical and angiographic follow-up results of stent-only therapy for intracranial vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysms (VBDA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety, clinical, and angiographic follow-up of stent-only therapy for VBDA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with 29 VBDAs (11 ruptured, 18 unruptured), not suitable for deconstructive treatment, underwent stent-only therapy. Feasibility, safety, clinical, and angiographic follow-up were retrospectively evaluated. Angiographic outcomes were compared between single-stent and multiple-stent groups. RESULTS: All attempted stent placements were successfully accomplished without any treatment-related complication. Of the 11 ruptured VBDAs, 4 were treated by single stents, 6 by double overlapping stents, and 1 by triple overlapping stents. Of the 18 unruptured VBDAs, 6 were treated by stents, and 12 by double overlapping stents. One patient with a ruptured VBDA, treated by single stent, had rebleeding and died. None of the remaining patients had posttreatment bleeding during follow-up (mean, 28 months; range, 7-50 months). Eight patients with ruptured VBDA and all patients with unruptured VBDA had excellent outcomes (modified Rankin Scale, 0-1). The remaining 2 patients with ruptured VBDA were moderately disabled because of the initial damage. Angiographic follow-up was available in 27 VBDAs, 4 to 42 months (mean, 12 months) after treatment. Follow-up angiograms revealed complete obliteration of the dissecting aneurysm in 12, partial obliteration in 12, stable in 1, enlargement in 1, and in-stent occlusion in 1. Angiographic improvement (complete or partial obliteration) was more frequent in the multiple-stent group (17/17) than in the single-stent group (7/9; P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: In this small series, stent-only therapy was safe and effective in the treatment of VBDAs that were not deemed suitable for treatment with parent-artery occlusion-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.format.extent1351~1356-
dc.relation.isPartOfAMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.subject.MESHAdult Aged Aneurysm, Dissecting/diagnostic imaging* Aneurysm, Dissecting/surgery* Blood Vessel Prosthesis* Cerebral Angiography/methods* Female Humans Intracranial Aneurysm/diagnostic imaging* Intracranial Aneurysm/surgery* Male Middle Aged Stents* Treatment Outcome Vertebral Artery Dissection/diagnostic imaging Vertebral Artery Dissection/surgery-
dc.titleClinical and angiographic follow-up of stent-only therapy for acute intracranial vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysms.-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Neurosurgery (신경외과학)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorB.M. Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorD.I. Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorY.S. Shin-
dc.contributor.googleauthorS.H. Suh-
dc.contributor.googleauthorE.C. Chung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorS.Y. Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorS.H. Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorY.S. Won-
dc.identifier.doi10.3174/ajnr.A1561-
dc.admin.authorfalse-
dc.admin.mappingfalse-
dc.contributor.localIdA00408-
dc.contributor.localIdA00498-
dc.contributor.localIdA00606-
dc.contributor.localIdA01510-
dc.contributor.localIdA01886-
dc.contributor.localIdA02125-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ00095-
dc.identifier.eissn1936-959X-
dc.identifier.pmid19342544-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Dong Ik-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Byung Moon-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Se Hyuk-
dc.contributor.alternativeNamePark, Sung Il-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameSuh, Sang Hyun-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameShin, Yong Sam-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Dong Ik-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Byung Moon-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Se Hyuk-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorPark, Sung Il-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorSuh, Sang Hyun-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorShin, Yong Sam-
dc.citation.volume30-
dc.citation.number7-
dc.citation.startPage1351-
dc.citation.endPage1356-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationAMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, Vol.30(7) : 1351-1356, 2009-
dc.identifier.rimsid54580-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Neurosurgery (신경외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiology (영상의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.