1 814

Cited 69 times in

Effects of neoadjuvant combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy on the CT evaluation of resectability and staging in patients with pancreatic head cancer

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author강창무-
dc.contributor.author홍혜숙-
dc.contributor.author김기황-
dc.contributor.author김명진-
dc.contributor.author김여은-
dc.contributor.author박미숙-
dc.contributor.author이우정-
dc.contributor.author임준석-
dc.contributor.author최진영-
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-24T16:25:30Z-
dc.date.available2015-04-24T16:25:30Z-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.issn0033-8419-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/103488-
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of neoadjuvant combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy (CCRT) on preoperative accuracy of multidetector computed tomography (CT) for resectability and tumor staging in patients with pancreatic head cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study received institutional review board approval and was exempted from informed consent requirements. From May 2002 to March 2007, 38 patients with pancreatic head adenocarcinoma underwent multidetector CT before surgery. Of these, 12 patients received neoadjuvant CCRT. Imaging findings were evaluated for tumor resectability and tumor staging. Surgical and pathologic results were used as the reference standard. The accuracy of resectability and individual components of each T category were compared between the patients with neoadjuvant CCRT and without it by using the chi(2) test or Fisher exact test. A P of less than .05 was considered as significant. RESULTS: The accuracy in determining resectability was 83% (10 of 12) in patients who had received neoadjuvant CCRT and 81% (21 of 26) in patients who had not, without significant difference (P > .05). Of 32 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy, histopathologic tumor staging was reported for T1 (n = 2), T2 (n = 1), and T3 (n = 9) lesions in patents with neoadjuvant CCRT (n = 12), and for T3 in all patients without neoadjuvant CCRT (n = 20). T-staging accuracy was 67% (eight of 12) with neoadjuvant CCRT and 95% (19 of 20) without it, with a significant difference (P = .0185). CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant CCRT reduces the accuracy of tumor restaging after treatment of pancreatic head cancer, but this effect is not so great as to affect the determination of resectability-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.format.extent758~765-
dc.relation.isPartOfRADIOLOGY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.subject.MESHAdult-
dc.subject.MESHAged-
dc.subject.MESHChemotherapy, Adjuvant/methods*-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHNeoadjuvant Therapy-
dc.subject.MESHNeoplasm Staging-
dc.subject.MESHPancreatectomy/methods*-
dc.subject.MESHPancreatic Neoplasms/diagnosis*-
dc.subject.MESHPancreatic Neoplasms/therapy*-
dc.subject.MESHPatient Selection-
dc.subject.MESHPrognosis-
dc.subject.MESHRadiotherapy, Adjuvant/methods*-
dc.subject.MESHReproducibility of Results-
dc.subject.MESHRetrospective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHSensitivity and Specificity-
dc.subject.MESHTomography, X-Ray Computed/methods*-
dc.subject.MESHTreatment Outcome-
dc.titleEffects of neoadjuvant combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy on the CT evaluation of resectability and staging in patients with pancreatic head cancer-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Surgery (외과학)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorYeo-Eun Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMi-Suk Park-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHye-Suk Hong-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChang Moo Kang-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJin-Young Choi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJoon Seok Lim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorWoo Jung Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMyeong-Jin Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKi Whang Kim-
dc.identifier.doi10.1148/radiol.2502080501-
dc.admin.authorfalse-
dc.admin.mappingfalse-
dc.contributor.localIdA02993-
dc.contributor.localIdA00088-
dc.contributor.localIdA04454-
dc.contributor.localIdA00345-
dc.contributor.localIdA00426-
dc.contributor.localIdA00688-
dc.contributor.localIdA01463-
dc.contributor.localIdA03408-
dc.contributor.localIdA04200-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ02596-
dc.identifier.eissn1527-1315-
dc.identifier.pmid19164113-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://pubs.rsna.org/doi/full/10.1148/radiol.2502080501?pubCode=cgi-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKang, Chang Moo-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameHong, Hye Suk-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Ki Whang-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Myeong Jin-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Yeo Eun-
dc.contributor.alternativeNamePark, Mi Sook-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameLee, Woo Jung-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameLim, Joon Seok-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameChoi, Jin Young-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLee, Woo Jung-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKang, Chang Moo-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorHong, Hye Suk-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Ki Whang-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Myeong Jin-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Yeo Eun-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorPark, Mi-Suk-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLim, Joon Seok-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorChoi, Jin Young-
dc.citation.volume250-
dc.citation.number3-
dc.citation.startPage758-
dc.citation.endPage765-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationRADIOLOGY, Vol.250(3) : 758-765, 2009-
dc.identifier.rimsid36035-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiology (영상의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Surgery (외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.