1 615

Cited 33 times in

Comparison of two different injection rates of gadoxetic acid for arterial phase MRI of the liver

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김명진-
dc.contributor.author최진영-
dc.contributor.author홍혜숙-
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-23T16:24:08Z-
dc.date.available2015-04-23T16:24:08Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.issn1053-1807-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/100516-
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: To compare two different injection rates for gadoxetic acid-enhanced hepatic arterial phase images on hepatic dynamic MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Hepatic arterial phase images were obtained after an intravenous bolus injection of gadoxetic acid at a rate of 1 mL/second in 62 patients and 2 mL/second in 64 patients on a 3 Tesla MR scanner using a test-bolus injection method. The signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) of the liver, portal vein, hepatic vein, aorta, spleen and pancreas were measured. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of hypervascular hepatic tumors was calculated. Two radiologists independently scored items to evaluate image quality of hepatic arterial phase and detected hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). RESULTS: The SNR of the aorta on the arterial phase images was significantly higher in the 1 mL/second group (235.43 +/- 82.59) than in the 2 mL/second group (190.94 +/- 96.90, P < 0.05). The SNRs of the liver, spleen and pancreas, the CNRs of hypervascular hepatic tumors, the detection rate of hypervascular HCC and subjective ratings for the optimal arterial enhancement were comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Injection rates of 2 mL/second and 1 mL/second provided comparable image qualities on arterial phase images of hepatic dynamic MRI using gadoxetic acid.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.format.extent365~372-
dc.relation.isPartOfJOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.subject.MESHAdult-
dc.subject.MESHAged-
dc.subject.MESHAged, 80 and over-
dc.subject.MESHContrast Media/administration & dosage-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHGadolinium DTPA/administration & dosage*-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHImage Enhancement/methods*-
dc.subject.MESHInjections, Intra-Arterial-
dc.subject.MESHLiver/pathology*-
dc.subject.MESHLiver Neoplasms/pathology*-
dc.subject.MESHMagnetic Resonance Imaging/methods*-
dc.subject.MESHMiddle Aged-
dc.subject.MESHReproducibility of Results-
dc.subject.MESHSensitivity and Specificity-
dc.titleComparison of two different injection rates of gadoxetic acid for arterial phase MRI of the liver-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Radiology (영상의학)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSang-Hoon Chung-
dc.contributor.googleauthorMyeong-Jin Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJin-Young Choi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHye-Suk Hong-
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jmri.22057-
dc.admin.authorfalse-
dc.admin.mappingfalse-
dc.contributor.localIdA00426-
dc.contributor.localIdA04200-
dc.contributor.localIdA04454-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ01567-
dc.identifier.eissn1522-2586-
dc.identifier.pmid20099350-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmri.22057/abstract-
dc.subject.keywordInjIection rate-
dc.subject.keywordGadoxetic acid-
dc.subject.keywordHepatic dynamic MR-
dc.subject.keywordhepatocellular carcinoma-
dc.subject.keywordcontrast material-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Myeong Jin-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameChoi, Jin Young-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameHong, Hye Suk-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Myeong Jin-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorChoi, Jin Young-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorHong, Hye Suk-
dc.citation.volume31-
dc.citation.number2-
dc.citation.startPage365-
dc.citation.endPage372-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, Vol.31(2) : 365-372, 2010-
dc.identifier.rimsid36540-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiology (영상의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.