2 496

Cited 55 times in

Efficacy of ramosetron in the treatment of male patients with irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea: a multicenter, randomized clinical trial, compared with mebeverine

Authors
 K. J. Lee  ;  N. Y. Kim  ;  J. K. Kwon  ;  K. C. Huh  ;  O. Y. Lee  ;  J. S. Lee  ;  S. C. Choi  ;  C. I. Sohn  ;  S. J. Myung  ;  H. J. Park  ;  M. K. Choi  ;  Y. T. Bak  ;  P. L. Rhee 
Citation
 NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, Vol.23(12) : 1098-1104, 2011 
Journal Title
NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY
ISSN
 1350-1925 
Issue Date
2011
MeSH
Adolescent ; Adult ; Benzimidazoles/therapeutic use* ; Diarrhea/drug therapy* ; Diarrhea/etiology ; Diarrhea/physiopathology ; Humans ; Irritable Bowel Syndrome/complications ; Irritable Bowel Syndrome/drug therapy* ; Irritable Bowel Syndrome/physiopathology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Parasympatholytics/therapeutic use* ; Phenethylamines/therapeutic use* ; Republic of Korea ; Serotonin 5-HT3 Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use* ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult
Keywords
5-HT3 receptor antagonist ; irritable bowel syndrome ; mebeverine ; ramosetron ; Rome III criteria
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The 5-HT(3) receptor antagonists are known to be effective for the treatment of diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), but not widely used yet. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of ramosetron, a 5-HT(3) receptor antagonist, and mebeverine in male patients with IBS with diarrhea (IBS-D).

METHODS: This study was performed in a multicenter, randomized, open-label design. Data of 343 male patients with IBS-D who were randomized to either a 4-week treatment of ramosetron 5μg once daily or a 4-week treatment of mebeverine 135 mg three times daily were analyzed by the intent-to-treat analysis. The primary efficacy parameter was the proportion of patients with adequate relief of IBS symptoms at the last week of treatment. The secondary endpoints were changes in each symptom score and the safety profiles.

KEY RESULTS: The responder rates for global IBS symptoms, abdominal pain/discomfort and abnormal bowel habits in the ramosetron and mebeverine groups significantly increased during the treatment period. The severity scores of abdominal pain/discomfort and urgency, the stool form score, and the stool frequency in both treatment arms were significantly reduced, compared with the baselines. There were no significant differences in the responder rates (37%vs 38% on ITT analysis) and adverse event profiles between the ramosetron and mebeverine groups. Neither severe constipation nor ischemic colitis was reported by ramosetron-treated patients.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Ramosetron 5μg once daily is as effective as mebeverine three times daily in male patients with IBS-D
Full Text
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2982.2011.01771.x/abstract
DOI
10.1111/j.1365-2982.2011.01771.x
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Park, Hyo Jin(박효진) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4814-8330
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/95207
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links