2 701

Cited 30 times in

The influence of perforating the autogenous block bone and the recipient bed in dogs. Part I: a radiographic analysis.

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김창성-
dc.contributor.author정의원-
dc.contributor.author채중규-
dc.contributor.author최성호-
dc.contributor.author차재국-
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-20T17:07:41Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-20T17:07:41Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.issn0905-7161-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/94014-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: This study evaluated radiographically the integration and volume maintenance of grafted autogenous block bone under various cortical bone perforation conditions in dogs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Five mongrel dogs were used. Each dog received four differently prepared onlay block bone grafts: a solid block graft was fixed on either (1) a cortically perforated recipient bed (SGPR) or (2) a nonperforated recipient bed (SGNPR), a perforated block graft was fixed on either (3) a nonperforated recipient bed (PGNPR) or (4) a cortically perforated recipient bed (PGPR). The animals were sacrificed at 1 day, 4 days, 10 days, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks after surgery. Specimens were prepared and radiographic analysis was conducted by using micro-computed tomography. The residual bone volume (RBV; mm(3) ), cross-sectional bone area (BA; mm(2)), and residual height (RH; %) of the grafted block bone were measured radiographically. RESULTS: The interface between the recipient bed and the graft showed no signs of bone integration at 1, 4, and 10 days of healing. However, at 4 weeks of healing, bone integration was observed in all groups. The RBV, BA, and RH of the grafts gradually decreased by 4 weeks of healing. At 8 weeks, the PGPR condition exhibited a higher RBV, BA, and RH than the other conditions, whereas the SGNPR condition exhibited the lowest RBV, BA, and RH. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that intentional cortical perforation on the recipient bed and block bone graft may influence volume maintenance of the graft.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.relation.isPartOfCLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.subject.MESHAnatomy, Cross-Sectional-
dc.subject.MESHAnimals-
dc.subject.MESHBone Resorption/classification-
dc.subject.MESHBone Resorption/diagnostic imaging-
dc.subject.MESHBone Transplantation/diagnostic imaging-
dc.subject.MESHBone Transplantation/methods*-
dc.subject.MESHDogs-
dc.subject.MESHGraft Survival-
dc.subject.MESHImage Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods-
dc.subject.MESHImaging, Three-Dimensional/methods-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHMaxilla/diagnostic imaging-
dc.subject.MESHMaxilla/surgery*-
dc.subject.MESHOrgan Size-
dc.subject.MESHOsteogenesis/physiology-
dc.subject.MESHOsteotomy/methods-
dc.subject.MESHRandom Allocation-
dc.subject.MESHTime Factors-
dc.subject.MESHTissue and Organ Harvesting/methods-
dc.subject.MESHTransplantation, Autologous-
dc.subject.MESHWound Healing/physiology-
dc.subject.MESHX-Ray Microtomography-
dc.titleThe influence of perforating the autogenous block bone and the recipient bed in dogs. Part I: a radiographic analysis.-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Dentistry (치과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Periodontology (치주과학)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKyung-Choon Oh-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJae-Kook Cha-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChang-Sung Kim-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSeong-Ho Choi-
dc.contributor.googleauthorJung-Kiu Chai-
dc.contributor.googleauthorUi-Won Jung-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02110.x-
dc.admin.authorfalse-
dc.admin.mappingfalse-
dc.contributor.localIdA01041-
dc.contributor.localIdA03692-
dc.contributor.localIdA04024-
dc.contributor.localIdA04081-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ00600-
dc.identifier.eissn1600-0501-
dc.identifier.pmid21985287-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02110.x/abstract-
dc.subject.keywordalveolar ridge augmentation-
dc.subject.keywordbone regeneration-
dc.subject.keyworddecortication-
dc.subject.keyworddogs-
dc.subject.keywordX‐ray microtomography-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKim, Chang Sung-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameJung, Ui Won-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameChai, Jung Kyu-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameChoi, Seong Ho-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Chang Sung-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorJung, Ui Won-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorChai, Jung Kyu-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorChoi, Seong Ho-
dc.rights.accessRightsnot free-
dc.citation.volume22-
dc.citation.number11-
dc.citation.startPage1298-
dc.citation.endPage1302-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationCLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, Vol.22(11) : 1298-1302, 2011-
dc.identifier.rimsid28614-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
2. College of Dentistry (치과대학) > Dept. of Periodontics (치주과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.