2 455

Cited 21 times in

Biweekly gemcitabine-paclitaxel, gemcitabine-carboplatin, or gemcitabine-cisplatin as first-line treatment in metastatic breast cancer after anthracycline failure: a phase II randomized selection trial.

Authors
 Binghe Xu  ;  Zefei Jiang  ;  Sung-Bae Kim  ;  Shiying Yu  ;  Jifeng Feng  ;  Artur Malzyner  ;  Auro del Giglio  ;  Hyun C. Chung  ;  Li Jun Shen  ;  Daniel Lee Kay Pen 
Citation
 BREAST CANCER, Vol.18(3) : 203-212, 2011 
Journal Title
BREAST CANCER
ISSN
 1340-6868 
Issue Date
2011
MeSH
Adult ; Anthracyclines/administration & dosage ; Anthracyclines/adverse effects ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use* ; Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy* ; Breast Neoplasms/mortality ; Breast Neoplasms/pathology* ; Carboplatin/administration & dosage ; Carboplatin/adverse effects ; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/drug therapy* ; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology ; Cisplatin/administration & dosage ; Cisplatin/adverse effects ; Deoxycytidine/administration & dosage ; Deoxycytidine/adverse effects ; Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives ; Disease-Free Survival ; Drug Administration Schedule ; Female ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Staging ; Paclitaxel/administration & dosage ; Paclitaxel/adverse effects ; Treatment Outcome
Keywords
Gemcitabine ; Paclitaxel ; Carboplatin ; Cisplatin ; Breast cancer
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The primary objective of this multicenter, open-label, randomized, parallel, phase II selection trial was to compare the objective tumor response to biweekly (every 2 weeks) gemcitabine/paclitaxel, gemcitabine/carboplatin, and gemcitabine/cisplatin as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients with stage IV disease who relapsed after anthracycline failure were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to gemcitabine (2,500 mg/m2) plus paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 (n = 49); plus carboplatin, area under the curve = 2.5 mg/mL × min (n = 47); or plus cisplatin 50 mg/m2 (n = 51). Study therapy continued up until a maximum of 8 cycles and follow-up continued for 24 months.

RESULTS: All patients were analyzed for efficacy and one patient was excluded from the safety analyses. The objective response was 26.5% [95% confidence interval (CI) 14.9-41.1] for gemcitabine/paclitaxel, 17.0% (95% CI 7.6-30.8) for gemcitabine/carboplatin, and 15.7% (95% CI 7.0-28.6) for gemcitabine/cisplatin. The adjusted odds ratio for tumor response was 0.33 (95% CI 0.10-1.06), P = 0.063 for gemcitabine/carboplatin versus gemcitabine/paclitaxel; 0.26 (95% CI 0.08-0.86), P = 0.027 for gemcitabine/cisplatin versus gemcitabine/paclitaxel; and 0.77 (95% CI 0.24-2.52), P = 0.671 for gemcitabine/cisplatin versus gemcitabine/carboplatin. There were no significant differences in overall survival or progression-free survival (P > 0.05). Grade 3 or 4 drug-related adverse events varied between groups and the majority of deaths (94.9%; 74/78) were related to disease progression.

CONCLUSIONS: The gemcitabine-based treatments had comparable activity and tolerability. Similar survival characteristics and different toxicity profiles suggested that gemcitabine-platinum may be evaluated further in patients after anthracycline failure.
Full Text
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs12282-011-0260-y
DOI
10.1007/s12282-011-0260-y
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Chung, Hyun Cheol(정현철) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0920-9471
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/93654
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links