289 526

Cited 14 times in

Detection of masked hypertension and the 'mask effect' in patients with well-controlled office blood pressure

Authors
 Sung-Ji Park  ;  Jeong Bae Park  ;  Dong-Ju Choi  ;  Ho Joong Youn  ;  Chang Gyu Park  ;  Young Keun Ahn  ;  Joon-Han Shin  ;  Dong Woon Kim  ;  Se Joong Rim  ;  Jang Ho Bae  ;  Hyun Young Park 
Citation
 CIRCULATION JOURNAL, Vol.75(2) : 357-365, 2011 
Journal Title
CIRCULATION JOURNAL
ISSN
 1346-9843 
Issue Date
2011
MeSH
Aged ; Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use ; Blood Glucose/analysis ; Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory ; C-Reactive Protein/analysis ; Delayed Diagnosis ; Diastole ; Fasting/blood ; Female ; Hospitals, University ; Humans ; Hypertension/diagnosis* ; Hypertension/drug therapy ; Hypertension/psychology ; Lipids/blood ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Office Visits ; Prevalence ; Systole
Keywords
Blood pressure ; Home monitoring ; Masked hypertension ; White-coat effect
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Masked hypertension (MH) is characterized by its hidden nature and poor prognosis. However, it is not practical to routinely recommend home or ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (HBP or AMBP) to all patients with apparently well-controlled BP. The purpose of this study is to present, within the group of patients with well-controlled office BP (OBP), the clinical predictors of MH and to evaluate the gap (ie, the `mask effect' (ME)) between OBP and HBP.

METHODS AND RESULTS: BP was measured at the outpatient clinic and at home in 1,019 treated hypertensive patients. Candidate predictors for MH were analyzed within 511 patients with well-controlled OBP (45.6% men, 57.1±9.0 years). Among them, the prevalence of MH was 20.9% (n=107). In the multivariate-adjusted analysis, the risk of MH increased with high serum fasting blood glucose level (odds ratio (OR) 1.009, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.001-1.018, P=0.020), higher systolic OBP (OR 1.075, 95%CI 1.045-1.106, P<0.001), higher diastolic OBP (OR 1.045, 95%CI 1.007-1.084, P=0.019) and the number of antihypertensive medications (OR 1.320, 95%CI 1.113-1.804, P=0.021). Furthermore, systolic HBP correlated well with systolic OBP (r=0.351, P<0.001) and with the degree of systolic ME (r=-0.672, P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS: To recognize MH, it is practical to investigate those patients who are taking multiple antihypertensive drugs and have a high OBP with a high FBG level. The term "ME" identifies MH more appropriately than the term "negative white-coat effect".
Files in This Item:
T201101175.pdf Download
DOI
10.1253/circj.CJ-10-0492
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Rim, Se Joong(임세중) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7631-5581
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/93112
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links