9 536

Cited 82 times in

Effects of vitreomacular adhesion on anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment for exudative age-related macular degeneration

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author고형준-
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-20T16:24:55Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-20T16:24:55Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.issn0161-6420-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/92672-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of posterior vitreomacular adhesion (VMA), documented by optical coherence tomography (OCT), on the outcome of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment for exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD). DESIGN: Retrospective comparative series. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 148 patients (148 eyes) who were newly diagnosed with exudative AMD and were treated by anti-VEGF in 1 eye from 2005 to 2008 with a minimum of 12 months follow-up. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed OCT and medical records of 148 patients with exudative AMD and categorized them according to the presence of posterior VMA into 2 subgroups: VMA (+) group (38 eyes) and VMA (-) group (110 eyes). Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) after anti-VEGF treatment were compared between the 2 groups at baseline; at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months; and at the last visit (mean = 21 months). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean changes in BCVA, which was converted to logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) values and CRT after anti-VEGF treatment. RESULTS: Mean BCVA significantly decreased over time in the VMA (+) group compared with the VMA (-) group (P = 0.039). At the last follow-up, mean BCVA had deteriorated from 0.87 logMAR (20/149 Snellen equivalent; baseline) to 0.98 logMAR (20/189 Snellen equivalent) in the VMA (+) group, but improved from 0.82 logMAR (20/132 Snellen equivalent, baseline) to 0.72 logMAR (20/104, Snellen equivalent) in the VMA (-) group (P = 0.028). In paired comparisons of BCVA between baseline and each follow-up visit, the VMA (-) group showed significant improvement of BCVA at every follow-up visit (P < 0.05); however, the VMA (+) group did not show significant visual improvement at any follow-up visit despite anti-VEGF treatment (P > 0.05). Comparison of mean CRT between baseline and each follow-up visit showed a statistically significant decrease at every follow-up in both groups (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Posterior VMA was associated with an inferior visual outcome after intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment for exudative AMD. Our results suggest that chronic tractional forces may antagonize the effect of anti-VEGF treatment, resulting in poor response to anti-VEGF treatment with patients with VMA.-
dc.description.statementOfResponsibilityopen-
dc.format.extent101~110-
dc.relation.isPartOfOPHTHALMOLOGY-
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 2.0 KR-
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/kr/-
dc.subject.MESHAged-
dc.subject.MESHAngiogenesis Inhibitors/therapeutic use*-
dc.subject.MESHAntibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use-
dc.subject.MESHAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized-
dc.subject.MESHBevacizumab-
dc.subject.MESHExudates and Transudates-
dc.subject.MESHFemale-
dc.subject.MESHFluorescein Angiography-
dc.subject.MESHFollow-Up Studies-
dc.subject.MESHHumans-
dc.subject.MESHIntravitreal Injections-
dc.subject.MESHMacula Lutea/physiopathology*-
dc.subject.MESHMacular Degeneration/drugtherapy*-
dc.subject.MESHMacular Degeneration/physiopathology-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHRanibizumab-
dc.subject.MESHRetrospective Studies-
dc.subject.MESHTissue Adhesions/physiopathology*-
dc.subject.MESHTomography, Optical Coherence-
dc.subject.MESHTreatmentOutcome-
dc.subject.MESHVascularEndothelial Growth FactorA/antagonists & inhibitors*-
dc.subject.MESHVisual Acuity/physiology-
dc.subject.MESHVitreous Body/physiopathology*-
dc.titleEffects of vitreomacular adhesion on anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment for exudative age-related macular degeneration-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.collegeCollege of Medicine (의과대학)-
dc.contributor.departmentDept. of Ophthalmology (안과학)-
dc.contributor.googleauthorSung Jun Lee-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHyoung Jun Koh-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.04.015-
dc.admin.authorfalse-
dc.admin.mappingfalse-
dc.contributor.localIdA00152-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ02432-
dc.identifier.eissn1549-4713-
dc.identifier.pmid20678805-
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161642010004434-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameKoh, Hyoung Jun-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKoh, Hyoung Jun-
dc.rights.accessRightsnot free-
dc.citation.volume118-
dc.citation.number1-
dc.citation.startPage101-
dc.citation.endPage110-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationOPHTHALMOLOGY, Vol.118(1) : 101-110, 2011-
dc.identifier.rimsid28687-
dc.type.rimsART-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Ophthalmology (안과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.