4 511

Cited 0 times in

Optical coherence tomography-based evaluation of malapposed strut coverage after drug-eluting stent implantation.

Authors
 Byeong-Keuk Kim  ;  Dong-Ho Shin  ;  Jung-Sun Kim  ;  Young-Guk Ko  ;  Donghoon Choi  ;  Yangsoo Jang  ;  Myeong-Ki Hong 
Citation
 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, Vol.28(8) : 1887-1894, 2012 
Journal Title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING
ISSN
 1569-5794 
Issue Date
2012
MeSH
Aged ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Coronary Angiography ; Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging ; Coronary Artery Disease/therapy* ; Coronary Vessels/diagnostic imaging ; Coronary Vessels/pathology* ; Drug-Eluting Stents* ; Female ; Humans ; Linear Models ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects ; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/instrumentation* ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prosthesis Design ; Registries ; Time Factors ; Tomography, Optical Coherence* ; Treatment Outcome
Keywords
Optical coherence tomography ; Coronary artery disease ; Stent
Abstract
Minimal data exist regarding the use of optical coherence tomography (OCT) to evaluate malapposed strut coverage following implantation of drug-eluting stents (DESs). Follow-up OCT examination after DES implantation was performed in 368 patients with 406 lesions at our institute. We assessed the status of malapposed strut coverage that was identified via OCT in 92 (23 %) lesions. An absence of uncovered struts among malapposed struts was defined as completely covered (CC) malapposition; the presence of uncovered struts was defined as incompletely covered (IC) malapposition. Among the 92 lesions with malapposed DES struts, CC malapposition was detected in 47 lesions (51 %). Compared to lesions with IC malapposition (n = 45, 49 %), lesions with CC malapposition showed a significantly lower percentage of uncovered struts among all the struts (14.9 ± 14.5 vs. 4.4 ± 8.5 %, respectively, p < 0.001) and among the other well-apposed struts without malapposition (12.7 ± 12.8 vs. 4.5 ± 8.7 %, respectively, p = 0.001). The degree of malapposed strut coverage was significantly different according to the type of DES; new-generation DESs such as everolimus- or zotarolimus-eluting stents showed a higher incidence of CC malapposition, compared to first-generation DESs such as sirolimus- or paclitaxel-eluting stents (82 vs. 34 %, respectively, p < 0.001). This study showed the complete coverage in about 50 % of the lesions with malapposed DES struts on follow-up OCT. The degree of malapposed DES strut coverage was strongly affected by the type of implanted DESs
Full Text
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10554-012-0039-z
DOI
22447206
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Ko, Young Guk(고영국) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7748-5788
Kim, Byeong Keuk(김병극) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2493-066X
Kim, Jung Sun(김중선) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2263-3274
Shin, Dong Ho(신동호) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7874-5542
Jang, Yang Soo(장양수) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2169-3112
Choi, Dong Hoon(최동훈) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2009-9760
Hong, Myeong Ki(홍명기) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2090-2031
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/90458
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links