10 429

Cited 0 times in

Comparison of the diagnostic yield of "MiroCam" and "PillCam SB" capsule endoscopy.

Authors
 Hong SP  ;  Cheon JH  ;  Kim TI  ;  Song SY  ;  Kim WH 
Citation
 HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY, Vol.59(115) : 778-781, 2012 
Journal Title
 HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY 
ISSN
 0172-6390 
Issue Date
2012
MeSH
Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anatomic Landmarks* ; Capsule Endoscopes* ; Capsule Endoscopy/instrumentation* ; Duodenum/pathology* ; Equipment Design ; Female ; Humans ; Intestinal Diseases/pathology* ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Republic of Korea ; Retrospective Studies ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Young Adult
Keywords
Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anatomic Landmarks* ; Capsule Endoscopes* ; Capsule Endoscopy/instrumentation* ; Duodenum/pathology* ; Equipment Design ; Female ; Humans ; Intestinal Diseases/pathology* ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Republic of Korea ; Retrospective Studies ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Young Adult
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Although capsule endoscopy (CE) is widely used to evaluate small bowel diseases, its diagnostic power has not been firmly established. The aim of this study was to compare the abilities of the "Miro- Cam" and "PillCam SB" to detect Z-line and duodenal papillae. METHODOLOGY: The records of 141 patients who had CE studies between January 2004 and December 2008 were retrospectively reviewed by two gastroenterologists. All patients had undergone esophagogastroduodenoscopy. The primary endpoint of the present study was the detection rate of Z-line and duodenal papillae. RESULTS: Among the 141 patients, 84 (60%) received CE using the PillCam SB and 57 (40%) using the MiroCam. There were no statistical differences in the baseline characteristics of the patients between the two groups. The Z-line detection rate was 36.9% with the PillCam SB and 47.7% with the MiroCam (p=0.227). The detection rate of duodenal papillae was 13.1% with the PillCam SB and 29.8% with the MiroCam (p=0.018). CONCLUSIONS: While the devices were similar for visualizing the Z-line, the MiroCam showed a higher diagnostic yield for detecting duodenal papillae than did the PillCam SB. The sensitivities of both for visualizing duodenal papillae were still limited, however.
Full Text
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/223982351
DOI
22469721
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Won Ho(김원호) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5682-9972
Kim, Tae Il(김태일) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4807-890X
Song, Si Young(송시영) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1417-4314
Cheon, Jae Hee(천재희) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2282-8904
Hong, Sung Pil(홍성필)
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/90357
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links