3 199

Cited 6 times in

Revision Cochlear Implantation With Different Electrodes Can Cause Incomplete Electrode Insertion and Poor Performance

Authors
 Seung-Ho Shin  ;  SeRa Park  ;  Won Sang Lee  ;  Hee Nam Kim  ;  Jae Young Choi 
Citation
 OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, Vol.34(3) : 549-553, 2013 
Journal Title
 OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY 
ISSN
 1531-7129 
Issue Date
2013
MeSH
Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation* ; Cochlear Implantation/methods* ; Cochlear Implants* ; Equipment Failure ; Female ; Hearing Loss/surgery* ; Humans ; Male ; Reoperation ; Retrospective Studies
Keywords
Complication ; Electrode ; Revision cochlear implantation
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To review our experiences with revision cochlear implantation (CI), to assess revision CI efficacy, and to find factors that cause incomplete electrode insertion. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review of revision CI from 2004 to 2011. SETTING: Academic tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Twenty-two patients who underwent revision CI. INTERVENTIONS(S): Revision cochlear implant surgery, explanted device analysis, electrode analysis for a newly implanted device, measurement of electrode insertion depth on postoperative radiographic evaluation, and postoperative speech perception test by open-set testing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Surgical outcomes, postoperative performance, and analysis of used electrodes. RESULTS: Approximately 2.7% (22/816) of CI recipients underwent revision surgery. The reasons for revision surgery were device failure (n = 14) and medical reason (n = 8). Cochlear implantation was performed at an average of 4.7 years after initial operation. Seventeen patients underwent revision CI with an electrode that was the same as or similar to the initial one, and all electrodes were fully inserted. Different electrode types were used in the remaining 5 patients. Interestingly, 4 of the 5 had incomplete electrode insertion. Among the 4 patients, 2 had poorer open set sentence scores after revision than after initial surgery. CONCLUSION: In this study, full electrode insertion was achieved in all cases where the same type of electrode was used during initial and revision CI. In contrast, we noticed incomplete insertion in 4 of 5 patients who had revision electrodes that differed from initial electrodes. While incomplete electrode insertion does not necessitate poor speech performance, some patients with incomplete electrode insertion certainly experience it. Therefore, electrode selection requires circumspection in revision CI. Choosing a thinner electrode for revision CI may reduce the possibility of incomplete electrode insertion.
Full Text
http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00129492-201303000-00026&LSLINK=80&D=ovft
DOI
10.1097/MAO.0b013e31828399da
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Otorhinolaryngology (이비인후과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Hee Nam(김희남)
Park, Se Ra(박세라)
Shin, Seung Ho(신승호)
Lee, Won Sang(이원상)
Choi, Jae Young(최재영) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9493-3458
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/87150
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse