5 592

Cited 15 times in

Comparison of intraocular pressures after myopic laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy: Tonometry-pachymetry, Goldmann applanation tonometry, dynamic contour tonometry, and noncontact tonometry

Authors
 Kyung Eun Han  ;  Hyesun Kim  ;  Na Rae Kim  ;  Ikhyun Jun  ;  Eung Kweon Kim  ;  Tae-im Kim 
Citation
 JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, Vol.39(6) : 888-897, 2013 
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY
ISSN
 0886-3350 
Issue Date
2013
MeSH
Adult ; Corneal Pachymetry/instrumentation* ; Female ; Humans ; Intraocular Pressure/physiology* ; Keratectomy, Subepithelial, Laser-Assisted* ; Lasers, Excimer/therapeutic use* ; Male ; Myopia/surgery* ; Prospective Studies ; Tonometry, Ocular/instrumentation* ; Young Adult
Keywords
Adult ; Corneal Pachymetry/instrumentation* ; Female ; Humans ; Intraocular Pressure/physiology* ; Keratectomy, Subepithelial, Laser-Assisted* ; Lasers, Excimer/therapeutic use* ; Male ; Myopia/surgery* ; Prospective Studies ; Tonometry, Ocular/instrumentation* ; Young Adult
Abstract
PURPOSE:
To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements using a new tonometer-pachymeter device (Tonopachy), Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), dynamic contour tonometry (DCT), and noncontact tonometry (NCT) before and after myopic laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK).
SETTING:
Institute of Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
DESIGN:
Prospective comparative observational study.
METHODS:
Nine IOP values were measured using 4 tonometers (6 IOPs by tonometer-pachymeter and 1 each by GAT, DCT, and NCT) and compared preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. Of the 6 IOP values measured by the tonometer-pachymeter, 1 showed uncorrected IOP and 5 indicated central corneal thickness (CCT)-corrected IOPs through different formulas.
RESULTS:
Preoperatively and postoperatively, the means of 9 IOP values measured by 4 tonometers were statistically different. The IOP measurements by the tonometer-pachymeter correlated with all other IOP values preoperatively; however, there was no correlation with IOP measurements using DCT postoperatively. Some IOPs using the tonometer-pachymeter were interchangeable with those using GAT preoperatively, but not with DCT preoperatively or postoperatively. The corrected IOP values of the tonometer-pachymeter formula 3 and DCT did not change after surgery. The percentage change in CCT and corneal curvature and change in diopters correlated with the percentage change in IOP measurements by GAT and NCT but not with those using DCT and the tonometer-pachymeter.
CONCLUSION:
Among the 9 IOP values, corrected IOP using the tonometer-pachymeter formula 3 showed similar IOP values after LASEK, as did DCT.
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE:
No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
Full Text
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0886335013001144
DOI
10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.01.035
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Ophthalmology (안과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Na Rae(김나래)
Kim, Eung Kweon(김응권) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1453-8042
Kim, Tae-Im(김태임) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6414-3842
Kim, Hye Sun(김혜선)
Han, Kyung Eun(한경은)
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/86990
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links