14 18

Cited 0 times in

Cited 0 times in

Evaluating the methodological quality of coordinate-based meta-analyses: the qual-CBMA checklist

Authors
 Radua, Joaquim  ;  Fortea, Lydia  ;  Albajes-Eizagirre, Anton  ;  Eickhoff, Claudia  ;  Fullana, Miquel A.  ;  Fusar-Poli, Paolo  ;  Mataix-Cols, David  ;  Shin, Jae Il  ;  Solanes, Aleix  ;  Tahmasian, Masoud  ;  Vieta, Eduard  ;  Vilajosana, Enric  ;  Eickhoff, Simon B.  ;  Muller, Veronika I. 
Citation
 FRONTIERS IN NEUROIMAGING, Vol.5, 2026-05 
Article Number
 1753543 
Journal Title
 FRONTIERS IN NEUROIMAGING 
ISSN
 2813-1193 
Issue Date
2026-05
Keywords
activation likelihood estimation ; checklist ; meta-analysis ; neuroimaging ; seed-based d mapping
Abstract
Voxel-based meta-analyses-also known as coordinate-based meta-analyses (CBMAs)-are powerful tools for synthesizing evidence from neuroimaging studies in human neuroscience, including investigations of psychological functions and differences in brain disorders. To achieve their full potential in accurately assessing the evidence, CBMAs should adhere to established best-practicmpe guidelines, such as the "Ten Simple Rules" published in 2018. Yet, even when studies report following these recommendations, the degree to which individual items are applicable or fully addressed is often unclear. To better support the evaluation of methodological rigor-which the 10 rules already promote but are not always consistently applied-, the developers of the most used CBMA methods followed a Delphi-style iterative process to create a reporting checklist focused on the methodological quality of CBMAs (Qual-CBMA). Qual-CBMA comprises criteria (e.g., preregistration, systematic search, homogeneous study characteristics, etc.) that authors should verify and comment on explicitly in the checklist (and, when unmet, also in the manuscript). The checklist encourages rigor and transparency by prompting authors to identify potential methodological limitations and to discuss their relevance-or irrelevance-in the context of their specific study. The checklist is designed as an aid to make reporting clearer and more transparent, not as a tool for evaluating whether authors have done something incorrectly. In this context, a high-quality CBMA is not defined by meeting every criterion, but by clearly commenting on the criteria-and explaining when unmet criteria are appropriately not applicable given the study's objectives. We encourage authors to submit the Qual-CBMA checklist, together with their accompanying comments, when publishing new CBMAs, thereby reinforcing transparency and rigorous methodology and advancing understanding in cognitive neuroscience and clinical conditions.
Files in This Item:
94426.pdf Download
DOI
10.3389/fnimg.2026.1753543
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Pediatrics (소아과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Shin, Jae Il(신재일) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2326-1820
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/213037
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links