9 9

Cited 0 times in

Cited 0 times in

MOG-IgG Positivity Does Not Equal MOGAD: Diagnostic Pitfall and Misapplication of the International MOGAD Panel Proposed Criteria in Real-World Practice

Authors
 Kang, You-Ri  ;  Kim, Ki Hoon  ;  Hyun, Jae-Won  ;  Kim, Ho Jin  ;  Kim, Su-Hyun 
Citation
 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROLOGY, Vol.22(3) : 338-342, 2026-05 
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
ISSN
 1738-6586 
Issue Date
2026-05
Keywords
myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease ; diagnostic errors ; autoantibodies ; clinical practice pattern
Abstract
Background and Purpose Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) has been increasingly recognized, yet concerns remain regarding the overuse and misinterpretation of MOG-IgG testing. The recently published MOGAD diagnostic criteria emphasize selective testing and rigorous interpretation in the context of compatible clinical syndromes and supportive features. We investigated, in real-world practice, the extent to which these criteria are appropriately applied and the frequency and characteristics of their misapplication at a referral center. Methods We retrospectively reviewed patients referred to the National Cancer Center with externally reported MOG-IgG positivity between January 2021 and December 2024. External assay results were based on laboratory-specific cutoffs, which had not been verified against clinically validated thresholds. Final diagnoses were determined by expert consensus after comprehensive evaluation, applying the 2023 international MOGAD diagnostic criteria. Results Fifty-seven patients with external MOG-IgG positivity were referred, of whom 48 (84.2%) had been labeled as MOGAD. Upon re-evaluation, only 39 patients (68.4%) met the diagnostic criteria. Of the 18 non-confirmed patients, 5 (27.8%) manifested nonspecific symptoms incompatible with core demyelinating events, 9 patients (50.0%) received an alternative diagnosis, and 4 (22.2%) presented core events but lacked supportive features. Conclusions Over one-third of patients with externally reported positive results did not meet diagnostic criteria, illustrating the risk of non-targeted MOG-IgG testing and overinterpretation of antibody results. Selective test utilization and strict adherence to diagnostic criteria in the context of appropriate clinical syndromes and supportive findings are essential to prevent overdiagnosis and inappropriate treatment.
Files in This Item:
93076.pdf Download
DOI
10.3988/jcn.2025.0529
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Neurology (신경과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Ki Hoon(김기훈) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6428-061X
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/212485
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links