0 0

Cited 0 times in

Cited 0 times in

Consensus position statements for the standardized application of histological grading and staging systems in MASH clinical trials

Authors
 Lackner, Carolin  ;  Gouw, Annette S. H.  ;  Alves, Venancio Avancini Ferreira  ;  Arola, Johanna  ;  Bedossa, Pierre  ;  Behling, Cynthia  ;  Brunt, Elisabeth M.  ;  Burt, Alastair  ;  Clouston, Andrew  ;  Cummings, Oscar  ;  Goodman, Zachary D.  ;  Guido, Maria  ;  Guy, Cynthia  ;  Hubscher, Stefan G.  ;  Hytiroglou, Prodromos  ;  Kleiner, David  ;  Pai, Rish  ;  Paradis, Valerie  ;  Park, Young Nyun  ;  Rastogi, Archana  ;  Schirmacher, Peter  ;  Wee, Aileen  ;  Yano, Hirohisa  ;  Yeh, Matthew  ;  Avian, Alexander  ;  Tiniakos, Dina G. 
Citation
 JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, Vol.84(4) : 693-701, 2026-04 
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
ISSN
 0168-8278 
Issue Date
2026-04
MeSH
Biopsy / standards ; Clinical Trials as Topic / standards ; Consensus ; Delphi Technique ; Fatty Liver* / diagnosis ; Fatty Liver* / pathology ; Humans ; Liver Cirrhosis / pathology ; Liver* / pathology ; Severity of Illness Index
Keywords
MASH ; liver biopsy ; interobserver bias ; MASH clinical trial ; Deplhi
Abstract
Background & Aims: Assessment of histologic disease activity (grading) and fibrosis (staging) is a prerequisite for patient selection and evaluation of treatment response in clinical trials of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). The lack of universally accepted definitions of histological components required for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) grading and staging, inconsistent histologic interpretations, and the absence of guidelines on how to apply currently used scoring systems, contribute to high interobserver variation and influence supervised machine learning algorithms. Methods: The International MASLD Pathology Group (IMPG), comprising 25 expert liver pathologists and one statistician, was established to develop guidance for the histological assessment of liver biopsies in MASH clinical trials and to define standards for liver biopsy processing, as well as to refine criteria for histological MASLD grading and staging. Statements were generated by three IMPG working subgroups and evaluated through a Delphi consensus procedure. Results: The IMPG working groups issued a total of 278 primary statements, which were evaluated in the first Delphi round, yielding 162 statements with 80% or higher agreement. The remaining 116 statements were discussed and either revised or not further considered. The resulting 33 revised statements were evaluated in a second Delphi round, yielding 192 final statements with 80% or higher agreement. Conclusion: For the first time, the IMPG statements provide guidelines to promote consensus among liver pathologists on the histopathological evaluation and scoring of liver biopsies for MASH clinical trials. Furthermore, they may inform the development of supervised machine learning algorithms for quantitative histology assessments of MASLD. (c) 2025 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Association for the Study of the Liver.
Full Text
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168827825025012
DOI
10.1016/j.jhep.2025.09.019
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Pathology (병리학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Park, Young Nyun(박영년) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0357-7967
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/211879
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links