6 9

Cited 0 times in

Cited 0 times in

Assessment tools for peripheral neuropathy in multiple myeloma

Authors
 Park, Sung-Soo  ;  Kwak, Kunye  ;  Baek, Seol-Hee  ;  Kim, Changgon  ;  Choi, Yoon Seok  ;  Park, Yong  ;  Kim, Byung Soo  ;  Kim, Jin Seok  ;  Min, Chang-Ki  ;  Kang, Ka-Won 
Citation
 KOREAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, Vol.41(2) : 230-241, 2026-03 
Journal Title
KOREAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
ISSN
 1226-3303 
Issue Date
2026-03
MeSH
Antineoplastic Agents* / adverse effects ; Humans ; Multiple Myeloma* / complications ; Multiple Myeloma* / diagnosis ; Multiple Myeloma* / drug therapy ; Neural Conduction ; Patient Reported Outcome Measures ; Peripheral Nervous System Diseases* / chemically induced ; Peripheral Nervous System Diseases* / diagnosis ; Peripheral Nervous System Diseases* / etiology ; Peripheral Nervous System Diseases* / physiopathology ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Quality of Life
Keywords
Multiple myeloma ; Peripheral neuropathy ; Nerve conduction study ; Patient-reported outcome
Abstract
Advances in treating multiple myeloma (MM) have improved survival, shifting the management focus toward quality of life. Peripheral neuropathy (PN) is a common treatment-related toxicity that significantly impairs quality of life. However, standardized assessment methods for PN in patients with MM are currently lacking. A comprehensive search of multiple databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed) was conducted to identify relevant records. Eligible studies were reviewed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Twenty-two studies were included, and 17 PN assessment tools were identified. Nerve conduction studies and the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events were the most commonly used clinician-based tools, whereas the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity was the most frequently used patient-reported outcome measure. The use of these tools varies depending on whether their purpose is diagnostic or evaluative. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic review to evaluate PN assessment tools for patients with MM, revealing substantial heterogeneity across studies. By organizing these diverse approaches, our findings can guide researchers and clinicians toward a more consistent and standardized PN evaluation, ultimately improving the management of treatment-related neuropathy in MM.
Files in This Item:
92224.pdf Download
DOI
10.3904/kjim.2025.281
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Jin Seok(김진석) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8986-8436
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/211623
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links