7 5

Cited 1 times in

Cited 0 times in

Comparative outcomes of simple versus radical hysterectomy in patients with and without very low-risk early-stage cervical cancer: An exploratory analysis from the Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup/Canadian Cancer Trials Group CX.5/ SHAPE trial

Authors
 Kim, Se Ik  ;  Kim, Jae-Weon  ;  Kwon, Janice S.  ;  Ferguson, Sarah E.  ;  Sebastianelli, Alexandra  ;  Bessette, Paul  ;  Mahner, Sven  ;  Gauthier, Tristan  ;  de Kroon, Cor  ;  van Driel, Willemien  ;  Williamson, Karin  ;  Goffin, Frederic  ;  Polterauer, Stephan  ;  Eyjolfsdottir, Brynhildur  ;  Lee, Jung-Yun  ;  Maguire, Patrick J.  ;  Juhasz-Boss, Ingolf  ;  Lim, Hyunji  ;  Seol, Aeran  ;  Shepherd, Lois  ;  Tu, Dongsheng  ;  Plante, Marie 
Citation
 GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, Vol.205 : 37-45, 2026-02 
Journal Title
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
ISSN
 0090-8258 
Issue Date
2026-02
MeSH
Adult ; Aged ; Canada ; Disease-Free Survival ; Female ; Humans ; Hysterectomy* / adverse effects ; Hysterectomy* / methods ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local / epidemiology ; Neoplasm Staging ; Treatment Outcome ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms* / mortality ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms* / pathology ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms* / surgery
Keywords
Cervical cancer ; SHAPE trial ; Conservative ; Liberal ; Simple hysterectomy ; Radical hysterectomy
Abstract
Objective. To compare oncologic outcomes and perioperative morbidity between simple hysterectomy (SH) and radical hysterectomy (RH) in patients with and without very low-risk early-stage cervical cancer from the phase III Simple Hysterectomy And PElvic node assessment (SHAPE) trial. Methods. Patients who underwent SH or RH in the SHAPE trial were classified into the Conservative SHAPE group (very low-risk), meeting criteria similar to the ConCerv trial, and the Liberal SHAPE group (without very low-risk), including everyone else. Between the SH and RH arms in each group, survival outcomes, including recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS), and intraoperative and postoperative morbidities were compared. Factors associated with recurrence and mortality rates were also investigated. Results. In the Conservative SHAPE group (n = 107), no recurrence was observed in either SH or RH arms, and only one non-cancer-related death in the RH arm during a median follow-up of 4.5 years. In the Liberal SHAPE group (n = 575), the SH arm showed similar 3-year pelvic RFS (96.9 % vs. 97.4 %; HR, 1.15; 95 % CI, 0.49-2.70), extrapelvic RFS (97.7 % vs. 99.6 %; HR, 3.64; 95 % CI, 0.76-17.5), overall RFS (95.4% vs. 97.4 %; HR, 1.56; 95 % CI, 0.70-3.48), and OS (98.9% vs. 99.3 %; HR, 1.21; 95 % CI, 0.41-3.59), compared with the RH arm. In multivariate analyses, SH was not associated with recurrence and mortality rates, while absence of residual disease in the hysterectomy specimen was associated with lower recurrence. In both groups, SH was associated with a lower risk of urinary retention and incontinence. Conclusion. There were similar recurrence and survival outcomes but less morbidity from simple hysterectomy compared to radical hysterectomy in patients with and without very low-risk early-stage cervical cancer from the SHAPE trial. (c) 2026 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Files in This Item:
91776.pdf Download
DOI
10.1016/j.ygyno.2026.01.001
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology (산부인과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Lee, Jung-Yun(이정윤) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7948-1350
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/211176
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links