0 27

Cited 0 times in

Cited 0 times in

Utility of CA125 KELIM in predicting benefit from hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in patients with advanced ovarian cancer: pooled analysis of KGOG3042 and KOV-HIPEC-01

Authors
 Cho, Hyun-Woong  ;  Chang, Suk-Joon  ;  Lim, Myong Cheol  ;  Kim, Ji Hyun  ;  Park, Sang-Yoon  ;  Lee, Jung-Yun  ;  Suh, Dong Hoon  ;  Song, Jae-Yun  ;  Choi, Min Chul  ;  Kim, Mi Kyung  ;  Kim, Hee-Seung  ;  Carrot, Aurore  ;  You, Benoit 
Citation
 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, Vol.36(1), 2026-01 
Article Number
 102746 
Journal Title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER
ISSN
 1048-891X 
Issue Date
2026-01
MeSH
Adult ; Aged ; CA-125 Antigen* / blood ; CA-125 Antigen* / metabolism ; Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures ; Female ; Humans ; Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy* / methods ; Membrane Proteins ; Middle Aged ; Ovarian Neoplasms* / blood ; Ovarian Neoplasms* / mortality ; Ovarian Neoplasms* / pathology ; Ovarian Neoplasms* / therapy ; Prognosis
Keywords
Modeled CA125 Elimination Rate Constant K (KELIM) ; Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) ; Ovarian Cancer ; Chemotherapy Response ; Predictive Biomarker
Abstract
Objective: Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) administered during interval cytoreductive surgery has shown survival benefits in advanced ovarian cancer. However, predictive biomarkers to guide patient selection for HIPEC are lacking. We evaluated the prognostic and predictive value of the modeled CA125 elimination rate constant K (KELIM), a surrogate marker of tumor chemosensitivity, in relation to the benefit of HIPEC. Methods: This pooled analysis included patients from the KOV-HIPEC-01 phase III trial and the KGOG3042 cohort study. KELIM values were estimated using CA125 kinetics during neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients were stratified by KELIM score as favorable (>= 1.0) or unfavorable (<1.0). The impact of HIPEC on progression free survival and overall survival was evaluated using univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses. Results: KELIM was assessable in 213 patients. In those with an unfavorable KELIM score, HIPEC significantly improved progression free survival (20.04 vs 10.25 months; HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.71) and overall survival (not reached vs 45.5 months; HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.73). No significant benefit from HIPEC was observed in patients with a favorable KELIM score. Subgroup analyses revealed that the benefit of HIPEC in patients with an unfavorable KELIM was more pronounced in those with high-grade serous carcinoma, BRCA1/2 wild-type status, age >60 years, and stage IV disease. Conclusions: HIPEC may provide survival benefit primarily in patients with an unfavorable KELIM score. KELIM may be a clinically useful biomarker to guide patient selection for HIPEC during interval cytoreductive surgery in advanced ovarian cancer.
Full Text
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1048891X25018663
DOI
10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.102746
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology (산부인과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Lee, Jung-Yun(이정윤) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7948-1350
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/210379
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links