2 2

Cited 0 times in

Cited 0 times in

Application of Single Versus Double-ProGlide Devices for Vascular Access Closure After Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Korean Patients

Authors
 Lee, Yangyoun  ;  Ryu, Jiwung  ;  Park, Geunhee  ;  Ko, Young-Guk  ;  Lee, Sang-Hyup  ;  Lee, Yong-Joon  ;  Lee, Seung-Jun  ;  Hong, Sung-Jin  ;  Ahn, Chul-Min  ;  Kim, Jung-Sun  ;  Kim, Byeong-Keuk  ;  Ko, Kyu-Yong  ;  Cho, Iksung  ;  Shim, Chi Young  ;  Hong, Geu-Ru  ;  Choi, Donghoon  ;  Hong, Myeong-Ki 
Citation
 JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, Vol.2025(1), 2025-12 
Article Number
 3396428 
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY
ISSN
 0896-4327 
Issue Date
2025-12
Keywords
aortic valve stenosis ; complications ; transcatheter aortic valve replacement ; vascular closure devices
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The double-ProGlide technique is commonly used to achieve hemostasis in patients undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However, it has been associated with the rise of access-site stenosis. Therefore, in this study, we compared the safety and effectiveness of the single-ProGlide technique, with the option to deploy additional ProGlides if needed, to the double-ProGlide method in patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR. Methods: In this single-center retrospective study, we included 551 patients who underwent transfemoral TAVR from May 2016 to July 2022. Propensity score matching was performed to control for confounding factors, resulting in two matched groups of 175 patients each. Primary outcomes included the technical success of vascular closure, immediate procedural results, 30-day clinical outcomes, and access-related vascular complications. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups after matching. No significant differences were observed in the immediate procedural results and 30-day clinical outcomes in the two groups. The single-ProGlide group showed a higher technical success rate for vascular closure (90.3% for single vs. 86.3% for double; p = 0.24) and a lower rate of any vascular complication (9.7% vs. 16.0%, p = 0.079) compared to the double-ProGlide group, although these differences did not reach statistical significance. Female sex (odds ratio [OR] 2.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.48-5.93, p = 0.003), smaller access vessel diameter (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.50-0.82, p < 0.001), and increased number of ProGlides used (OR 4.94, 95% CI 2.46-10.6, p < 0.001) were associated with vascular closure device failure. Conclusions: The single-ProGlide technique, with the option to use additional devices as required, appears to be a viable alternative to the double-ProGlide technique. It demonstrated high technical success for main-access closure and a trend toward lower vascular complication rates in transfemoral TAVR, although these differences did not reach statistical significance.
Files in This Item:
91135.pdf Download
DOI
10.1155/joic/3396428
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Go, Kyu-Yong(고규용)
Ko, Young Guk(고영국) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7748-5788
Kim, Byeong Keuk(김병극) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2493-066X
Kim, Jung Sun(김중선) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2263-3274
Shim, Chi Young(심지영) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6136-0136
Ahn, Chul-Min(안철민)
Lee, Sanghyup(이상협)
Lee, Seung-Jun(이승준) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9201-4818
Lee, Yong Joon(이용준)
Cho, Ik Sung(조익성)
Choi, Dong Hoon(최동훈) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2009-9760
Hong, Geu Ru(홍그루) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4981-3304
Hong, Myeong Ki(홍명기) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2090-2031
Hong, Sung Jin(홍성진) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4893-039X
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/210097
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links