0 1

Cited 0 times in

Cited 0 times in

Transpacific multicenter collaborative study of minimally invasive proximal gastrectomy vs. minimally invasive total gastrectomy for proximal gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancers: 3-month follow-up results

Authors
 Ikoma, Naruhiko  ;  Grotz, Travis  ;  Kawakubo, Hirofumi  ;  Kim, Hyoung-Il  ;  Matsuda, Satoru  ;  Okui, Jun  ;  Tomita, Koichi  ;  Hirata, Yuki  ;  Nakao, Atsushi  ;  Williams, Loretta A.  ;  Wang, Xin Shelley  ;  Wang, Xuemei  ;  Mansfield, Paul F.  ;  Hyung, Woo-Jin  ;  Badgwell, Brian D.  ;  Strong, Vivian E.  ;  Kitagawa, Yuko 
Citation
 SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, Vol.39(12) : 8371-8384, 2025-12 
Journal Title
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES
ISSN
 0930-2794 
Issue Date
2025-12
MeSH
Aged ; Esophageal Neoplasms* / pathology ; Esophageal Neoplasms* / surgery ; Esophagogastric Junction* / pathology ; Esophagogastric Junction* / surgery ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gastrectomy* / adverse effects ; Gastrectomy* / methods ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures* / methods ; Postoperative Complications / epidemiology ; Postoperative Complications / etiology ; Prospective Studies ; Quality of Life ; Stomach Neoplasms* / pathology ; Stomach Neoplasms* / surgery ; Treatment Outcome
Keywords
Robotic gastrectomy ; Proximal gastrectomy ; Total gastrectomy ; Patient-reported outcomes ; Quality of life
Abstract
Background Total gastrectomy (TG) remains the standard surgical approach for proximal gastric and gastroesophageal junction (P/GEJ) cancers. However, experts increasingly perform proximal gastrectomy (PG) with anti-reflux reconstruction. The benefits of minimally invasive PG (MIPG) over minimally invasive TG (MITG), particularly regarding postoperative quality of life (QoL), remain unclear. Methods We conducted a transpacific, multicenter, nonrandomized, prospective cohort study to compare symptom burden outcomes (symptom occurrence, symptom severity, and daily functioning) between MIPG and MITG in patients with P/GEJ cancers. Symptom burden data was collected using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI-GI +). Results Among 71 patients with P/GEJ cancers enrolled from 2022 through 2024, 64 underwent either MITG (n = 26, 41%) or MIPG (n = 38, 59%). Thirty-nine (61%) patients were treated at Asian centers, and 25 (39%) patients were treated at U.S. centers. Compared to the MIPG patients, the MITG patients had a larger mean tumor size (5.7 vs. 2.3 cm) and a higher prevalence of signet ring cell histology (50 vs. 18%). Operation times were comparable between the MITG and MIPG groups (median: 288.5 vs. 277.0 min), as were the rates of postoperative complications (19 vs. 24%), anastomotic leaks (0 vs. 3%), 90-day mortality (0 vs. 3%), and positive proximal margins (8 vs. 0%, all p > 0.05). QoL data (MDASI-GI +) were collected from at least 95% of patients at all time points. Key metrics related to QoL-appetite, reflux, total symptom burden, and functional interference-did not differ significantly between groups at 1 and 3 months postoperatively. A linear mixed-effects model showed that body-weight trajectories over time did not differ significantly between the MITG and MIPG groups, and there was no significant difference between their highest weight loss percentages within the first 3 months postoperatively. At postoperative month 3, hemoglobin, albumin, vitamin B12, and ghrelin levels were comparable between the groups. Conclusion MIPG and MITG demonstrated equivalent short-term safety, and MIPG did not confer measurable QoL advantages, including in appetite, within 3 months after surgery. Longer-term follow-up is ongoing to evaluate potential delayed advantages.
Full Text
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00464-025-12257-4
DOI
10.1007/s00464-025-12257-4
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Surgery (외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Kim, Hyoung Il(김형일) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6134-4523
Hyung, Woo Jin(형우진) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8593-9214
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/209803
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links