0 22

Cited 0 times in

Cited 0 times in

Comparative Outcomes of Revision Carpal Tunnel Release with External Neurolysis versus Primary Carpal Tunnel Release: A Propensity-Matched Study

Authors
 Kim, Hyoung Bok  ;  Ha, Joong-Won  ;  Kang, Hyun Tak  ;  Park, Munsu  ;  Lee, Jun-Ku 
Citation
 JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-ASIAN-PACIFIC VOLUME, Vol.30(6) : 641-648, 2025-12 
Journal Title
Journal of Hand Surgery Asian-Pacific volume
ISSN
 2424-8355 
Issue Date
2025-12
MeSH
Adult ; Aged ; Carpal Tunnel Syndrome* / surgery ; Decompression, Surgical* / methods ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pain Measurement ; Propensity Score ; Reoperation* ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome
Keywords
Carpal tunnel syndrome ; Revision carpal tunnel release ; External neurolysis ; Propensity score matching ; Surgical outcomes
Abstract
Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a common neuropathy of the upper limb, with carpal tunnel release (CTR) being a widely performed surgical intervention when conservative treatments fail. However, up to 20% of patients experience persistent or recurrent symptoms, and up to 12% may require revision surgery. This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of revision CTR with external neurolysis compared to primary CTR using propensity score matching (PSM). Methods: This retrospective single-centre cohort study included patients who underwent primary and revision CTR between March 2021 and February 2024. A total of 38 patients were analysed, with 19 patients undergoing revision CTR (Group 1) and 19 patients undergoing primary CTR (Group 2). PSM (1:1 nearest-neighbour, calliper 0.2) was used to ensure comparability between the groups based on age, weight, height, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities and the operated arm. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain and the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) for symptom severity and functional status. Results: Patients in Group 1 initially presented with significantly higher VAS scores compared to Group 2 (8.1 vs. 6.5, p = 0.001). At an average follow-up of 13.9 months, the BCTQ scores for symptom severity scale (SSS) and functional status scale (FSS) in Group 1 were comparable to those in Group 2 (SSS: 16.0 vs. 17.4, p = 0.393; FSS: 12.2 vs. 14.9, p = 0.101). No significant differences in CTS severity grades on electrodiagnostic studies were observed between the groups preoperatively. One patient in Group 1 experienced symptom recurrence 18 months postoperatively, but no other complications were reported. Conclusions: Revision CTR with external neurolysis can effectively manage persistent or recurrent CTS, though patients may require a longer recovery period to achieve outcomes similar to those undergoing primary CTR.
Full Text
https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/full/10.1142/S2424835525500651
DOI
10.1142/S2424835525500651
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Orthopedic Surgery (정형외과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Park, Moon Soo(박문수)
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/209419
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links