Lace Index: Predict the High-Risk of 30-Days Readmission of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: National Health Insurance Claims Data 2011-2020

Vasuki Rajaguru; Whiejong Han; Suk-Yong Jang; Jaeyong Shin; Sang Gyu Lee; Tae Hyun Kim

doi:10.1111/jep.70289

YUHSpace

BROWSE

5 12

Cited 0 times in

Lace Index: Predict the High-Risk of 30-Days Readmission of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: National Health Insurance Claims Data 2011-2020

Authors: Vasuki Rajaguru ; Whiejong Han ; Suk-Yong Jang ; Jaeyong Shin ; Sang Gyu Lee ; Tae Hyun Kim

Citation: JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, Vol.31(7) : e70289, 2025-10

Journal Title: JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE

ISSN: 1356-1294

Issue Date: 2025-10

MeSH: Adult ; Aged ; Comorbidity ; Emergency Service, Hospital / statistics & numerical data ; Female ; Humans ; Length of Stay* / statistics & numerical data ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Myocardial Infarction* / epidemiology ; Myocardial Infarction* / mortality ; Myocardial Infarction* / therapy ; National Health Programs / statistics & numerical data ; Patient Readmission* / statistics & numerical data ; Republic of Korea / epidemiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Assessment / methods ; Risk Factors

Keywords: 30‐days readmission ; Korea ; LACE index ; acute myocardial infarction ; health claims data ; prediction model ; risk stratification

Abstract: Background: Readmission following acute myocardial infarction (AMI) poses significant challenges to health systems and patient outcomes. The LACE index, a composite of Length of stay, Acuity of admission, Comorbidities, and Emergency department visits, is widely used for readmission prediction. However, its performance in large-scale, real-world Korean cohorts remains understudied.

Objective: This study aimed to validate the predictive performance of the LACE index for 30-day readmissions in AMI patients using a nationally representative Korean cohort.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service Sample (NHISS) database from 2011 to 2020. A total of 609,640 adult patients hospitalized for AMI were included. The LACE index was calculated for each patient, and 30-day readmissions were identified. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) for readmission. Model discrimination was assessed using ROC curve analysis and C-statistics. Subgroup and survival analyses were performed by age, LACE score, and comorbidity burden.

Results: Among 609,640 AMI patients, 205 (0.034%) experienced 30-day readmission. Patients with a LACE score of ≥ 10 had significantly higher odds of readmission (OR = 2.65; 95% CI: 1.68-4.19, p < 0.001) compared to those with scores 0-4. Middle-aged adults (35-64 years) also showed elevated readmission risk (OR = 3.42; 95% CI: 1.74-6.73, p < 0.001), while older adults (≥ 65 years) did not have significantly different risk. The LACE index showed moderate discriminatory performance (C-statistics = 0.71). Kaplan-Meier survival curves demonstrated significantly lower 30-day survival among patients with LACE ≥ 10.

Conclusions: Study findings suggest the LACE index is a useful tool for predicting 30-day readmissions among AMI patients in Korea. Its simplicity and moderate accuracy support its application in clinical and policy-level risk stratification strategies. Future prospective studies should refine prediction models by incorporating additional clinical variables.