0 8

Cited 0 times in

Cited 0 times in

Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma 3 Emerging evidence-based role for external-beam radiation therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma

Authors
 Dudzinski, Stephanie  ;  Newman, Neil B.  ;  Mcintyre, Jeff  ;  Engineer, Reena  ;  Sanford, Nina N.  ;  Wo, Jennifer Y.  ;  Seong, Jinsil  ;  Guha, Chandan  ;  Chang, Daniel  ;  Hong, Theodore S.  ;  Dawson, Laura A.  ;  Koay, Eugene J.  ;  Ludmir, Ethan B. 
Citation
 LANCET GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, Vol.10(4) : 387-398, 2025-04 
Journal Title
LANCET GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
ISSN
 2468-1253 
Issue Date
2025-04
MeSH
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular* / radiotherapy ; Evidence-Based Medicine ; Humans ; Liver Neoplasms* / radiotherapy ; Radiosurgery / methods ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Sorafenib
Keywords
Sorafenib ; Sorafenib ; Sorafenib ; Clinical Article ; Drug Megadose ; Evidence Based Practice ; External Beam Radiotherapy ; Human ; Liver Cell Carcinoma ; Liver Parenchyma ; Liver Transplantation ; Overall Survival ; Quality Of Life ; Radiotherapy ; Recurrence Free Survival ; Review ; Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy ; Surgery ; Therapy ; Thermal Ablation ; Treatment Guideline ; Adverse Event ; Evidence Based Medicine ; Liver Tumor ; Procedures ; Radiosurgery ; Randomized Controlled Trial (topic) ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular ; Evidence-based Medicine ; Humans ; Liver Neoplasms ; Radiosurgery ; Randomized Controlled Trials As Topic ; Sorafenib
Abstract
The primary curative therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma are resection or liver transplantation. For patients requiring downstaging or who are unresectable at presentation, the landscape of local treatment options has vastly changed over the past decades. This change is partly due to the paucity of high-level evidence to guide the selection of liver-directed therapies, where physician preference and treatment patterns have historically resulted in relegating external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) to a secondary option in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in cases where arterially directed therapies or thermal ablations were not possible. However, technology advancements have substantially improved the ability to treat liver malignancies with high doses of radiation therapy and to minimise doses to uninvolved hepatic parenchyma and other nearby organs. These advancements have enabled safe treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with EBRT, with low risk of toxicity. Recent randomised trials support the role of EBRT in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma from early to advanced stages. These trials identified that EBRT improved several key patient-centred outcomes, including overall survival when using stereotactic body radiotherapy and sorafenib compared with sorafenib alone in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, recurrence-free survival with the use of adjuvant EBRT in select patients after hepatocellular carcinoma resection, and quality of life for patients with painful hepatocellular carcinoma masses treated with palliative EBRT. With emerging high-quality evidence, hepatocellular carcinoma therapeutic guidelines should include the growing role of EBRT in improving the quality and quantity of life for patients with liver cancer.
Full Text
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S246812532400267X
DOI
10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00267-X
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Radiation Oncology (방사선종양학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Seong, Jin Sil(성진실) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1794-5951
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/208651
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links