0 4

Cited 0 times in

Cited 0 times in

Beneficial effects of probiotics on dysbiosis of gut microbiota induced by antibiotic treatment in healthy dogs

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKim, Sung-Jae-
dc.contributor.authorChung, Hee-Chun-
dc.contributor.authorPark, Soo-Yeon-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Jae-Myun-
dc.contributor.authorHan, Jeong-Hee-
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-07T03:02:25Z-
dc.date.available2025-11-07T03:02:25Z-
dc.date.created2025-08-26-
dc.date.issued2025-08-
dc.identifier.issn0034-5288-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/208425-
dc.description.abstractThe gut microbiota plays a crucial role in maintaining host health. While numerous studies have explored the impact of antibiotics on the gut microbiota in humans, limited research has examined how antibiotics affect the gut microbiome in dogs. This study investigated the effects of antibiotic treatment on the gut microbiota of dogs and assessed whether probiotic supplementation could prevent antibiotic-induced dysbiosis. Fourteen healthy young dogs undergoing castration were included in the study. All dogs received a single injection of cefovecin immediately after surgery. The probiotics group (7 dogs) was given a probiotic complex daily starting on the day of surgery and continuing for two weeks, while the non-probiotics group (7 dogs) received no supplementation. Fecal samples were collected on the day of surgery and two weeks later during the follow-up visit for suture removal for microbiome analysis. In microbial diversity analysis, alpha-diversity was significantly higher in the probiotic-supplemented group compared to the non-probiotics group (p < 0.05). beta-diversity analysis revealed significant differences in microbial community composition in the non-probiotics group after antibiotic treatment (p < 0.05), while no significant differences were observed in the probiotics group. Relative abundance analysis indicated that Clostridioides, a marker of antibiotic-induced dysbiosis, significantly increased in dogs without probiotics after antibiotic treatment (p < 0.05). In contrast, Butyricicoccus, a butyrate-producing bacterium with gut health benefits, was significantly enriched in the probiotics group (p < 0.05). These findings suggest that probiotic supplementation supports healthier gut microbiome recovery following antibiotic treatment and highlights its potential to enhance gut microbiota restoration and mitigate gut dysbiosis caused by antibiotics.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherBritish Veterinary Association-
dc.relation.isPartOfRESEARCH IN VETERINARY SCIENCE-
dc.relation.isPartOfRESEARCH IN VETERINARY SCIENCE-
dc.subject.MESHAnimals-
dc.subject.MESHAnti-Bacterial Agents* / adverse effects-
dc.subject.MESHDogs / microbiology-
dc.subject.MESHDysbiosis* / chemically induced-
dc.subject.MESHDysbiosis* / microbiology-
dc.subject.MESHDysbiosis* / prevention & control-
dc.subject.MESHDysbiosis* / veterinary-
dc.subject.MESHFeces / microbiology-
dc.subject.MESHGastrointestinal Microbiome* / drug effects-
dc.subject.MESHMale-
dc.subject.MESHProbiotics* / administration & dosage-
dc.subject.MESHProbiotics* / pharmacology-
dc.titleBeneficial effects of probiotics on dysbiosis of gut microbiota induced by antibiotic treatment in healthy dogs-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.googleauthorKim, Sung-Jae-
dc.contributor.googleauthorChung, Hee-Chun-
dc.contributor.googleauthorPark, Soo-Yeon-
dc.contributor.googleauthorLee, Jae-Myun-
dc.contributor.googleauthorHan, Jeong-Hee-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.rvsc.2025.105674-
dc.relation.journalcodeJ03045-
dc.identifier.eissn1532-2661-
dc.identifier.pmid40347600-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034528825001481-
dc.subject.keywordGut microbiome-
dc.subject.keywordDogs-
dc.subject.keywordProbiotics-
dc.subject.keywordAntibiotics-
dc.subject.keywordGut dysbiosis-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorChung, Hee-Chun-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLee, Jae-Myun-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-105004596751-
dc.identifier.wosid001490677500003-
dc.citation.volume191-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationRESEARCH IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, Vol.191, 2025-08-
dc.identifier.rimsid89071-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorGut microbiome-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorDogs-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorProbiotics-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorAntibiotics-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorGut dysbiosis-
dc.subject.keywordPlusEXTENDED-SPECTRUM CEPHALOSPORIN-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCLOSTRIDIUM-DIFFICILE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMECHANISMS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCEFOVECIN-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCATS-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.description.isOpenAccessN-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryVeterinary Sciences-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaVeterinary Sciences-
dc.identifier.articleno105674-
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Microbiology (미생물학교실) > 1. Journal Papers

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.