0 30

Cited 1 times in

Cited 0 times in

Machine learning prediction of in-hospital mortality and external validation in patients with cardiogenic shock: the RESCUE score

Authors
 Cha, Ji Hyun  ;  Choi, Ki Hong  ;  Ahn, Chul-Min  ;  Yu, Cheol Woong  ;  Park, Ik Hyun  ;  Jang, Woo Jin  ;  Kim, Hyun-Joong  ;  Bae, Jang-Whan  ;  Kwon, Sung Uk  ;  Lee, Hyun-Jong  ;  Lee, Wang Soo  ;  Jeong, Jin-Ok  ;  Park, Sang-Don  ;  Park, Taek Kyu  ;  Lee, Joo Myung  ;  Bin Song, Young  ;  Hahn, Joo-Yong  ;  Choi, Seung-Hyuk  ;  Gwon, Hyeon-Cheol  ;  Yang, Jeong Hoon 
Citation
 REVISTA ESPANOLA DE CARDIOLOGIA, Vol.78(8) : 707-716, 2025-08 
Journal Title
REVISTA ESPANOLA DE CARDIOLOGIA
ISSN
 0300-8932 
Issue Date
2025-08
MeSH
Aged ; Female ; Hospital Mortality / trends ; Humans ; Machine Learning* ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prognosis ; Registries* ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Assessment / methods ; Risk Factors ; Shock, Cardiogenic* / mortality ; Shock, Cardiogenic* / therapy ; Survival Rate / trends
Keywords
Cardiogenic shock ; Risk stratification ; Machine learning ; Prognosis
Abstract
Introduction and objectives: Despite advances in mechanical circulatory support, mortality rates in cardiogenic shock (CS) remain high. A reliable risk stratification system could serve as a valuable guide in the clinical management of patients with CS. This study aimed to develop and externally validate a risk prediction model for in-hospital mortality in CS patients using machine learning (ML) algorithms. Methods: Data from 1247 patients with all-cause CS in the RESCUE registry (January 2014-December 2018) were analyzed. Key predictive variables were identified using 4 ML algorithms. A risk prediction model, the RESCUE score, was developed using logistic regression based on the selected variables. Internal validation was conducted within the RESCUE registry, and external validation was performed using an independent CS registry of 750 patients. Results: The 4 ML models identified 7 predictors: age, vasoactive inotropic score, left ventricular ejection fraction, lactic acid level, in-hospital cardiac arrest at presentation, need for continuous renal replacement therapy, and mechanical ventilation. The RESCUE score demonstrated strong predictive performance, with an AUC of 0.86 (95%CI, 0.83-0.88) for in-hospital mortality. Ten-fold internal cross-validation yielded an AUC of 0.86 (95%CI, 0.77-0.95). External validation showed an AUC of 0.80 (95%CI, 0.76-0.84). Conclusions: Our ML-based risk-scoring system, the RESCUE score, demonstrated excellent predictive performance for in-hospital mortality in all patients with CS, regardless of cause. The system could be a useful and reliable tool to estimate risk stratification of CS in everyday clinical practice. Clinical trial registration: NCT02985008. (c) 2025 Sociedad Espa & ntilde;ola de Cardiologia. Published by Elsevier Espa & ntilde;a, S.L.U. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
Full Text
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1885585725000209
DOI
10.1016/j.rec.2025.01.003
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Internal Medicine (내과학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Ahn, Chul-Min(안철민)
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/207773
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links