Embolization of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure devices: Timing, management and clinical outcomes
Authors
Sophie Eppinger ; Kerstin Piayda ; Roberto Galea ; Marcus Sandri ; Moniek Maarse ; Ahmet Güner ; Can Y Karabay ; Ashish Pershad ; Wern Y Ding ; Adel Aminian ; Ibrahim Akin ; Karapet V Davtyan ; Ivan A Chugunov ; Eloi Marijon ; Liesbeth Rosseel ; Thomas Robert Schmidt ; Nicolas Amabile ; Kasper Korsholm ; Juha Lund ; Enio Guerios ; Ignacio J Amat-Santos ; Giacomo Boccuzzi ; Christopher R Ellis ; Avi Sabbag ; Henning Ebelt ; Brian Clapp ; Hana Vaknin Assa ; Amos Levi ; Jakob Ledwoch ; Sonja Lehmann ; Oh-Hyun Lee ; George Mark ; Wendy Schell ; Domenico G Della Rocca ; Andrea Natale ; Ole de Backer ; Joelle Kefer ; Pablo P Esteban ; Mark Abelson ; Pradhum Ram ; Pamela Moceri ; Jose G Galache Osuna ; Xavier Millán Alvarez ; Ignacio Cruz-Gonzalez ; Tom de Potter ; Moubarak Ghassan ; Andrey Osadchiy ; Weita Chen ; Sandeep K Goyal ; Francesco Giannini ; Máximo Rivero-Ayerza ; Shazia Afzal ; Christian Jung ; Carsten Skurk ; Martin Langel ; Mark Spence ; Evgeny Merkulov ; Mathieu Lempereur ; Seung Y Shin ; Jules Mesnier ; Heather L McKinney ; Brian T Schuler ; Sebastien Armero ; Livia Gheorghe ; Marco B M Ancona ; Lino Santos ; Jacques Mansourati ; Luis Nombela-Franco ; Francesco Nappi ; Michael Kühne ; Achille Gaspardone ; Jesper van der Pals ; Matteo Montorfano ; Juan Fernández-Armenta ; James E Harvey ; Josep Rodés-Cabau ; Norbert Klein ; Sajjad A Sabir ; Jung-Sun Kim ; Stephane Cook ; Ran Kornowski ; Antti Saraste ; Jens E Nielsen-Kudsk ; Dhiraj Gupta ; Lucas Boersma ; Lorenz Räber ; Kolja Sievert ; Horst Sievert ; Stefan Bertog
Background: Left atrial appendage (LAA) occluder embolization is an infrequent but serious complication.
Objectives: We aim to describe timing, management and clinical outcomes of device embolization in a multi-center registry.
Methods: Patient characteristics, imaging findings and procedure and follow-up data were collected retrospectively. Device embolizations were categorized according to 1) timing 2) management and 3) clinical outcomes.
Results: Sixty-seven centers contributed data. Device embolization occurred in 108 patients. In 70.4 % of cases, it happened within the first 24 h of the procedure. The device was purposefully left in the LA and the aorta in two (1.9 %) patients, an initial percutaneous retrieval was attempted in 81 (75.0 %) and surgery without prior percutaneous retrieval attempt was performed in 23 (21.3 %) patients. Two patients died before a retrieval attempt could be made. In 28/81 (34.6 %) patients with an initial percutaneous retrieval attempt a second, additional attempt was performed, which was associated with a high mortality (death in patients with one attempt: 2.9 % vs. second attempt: 21.4 %, p < 0.001). The primary outcome (bailout surgery, cardiogenic shock, stroke, TIA, and/or death) occurred in 47 (43.5 %) patients. Other major complications related to device embolization occurred in 21 (19.4 %) patients.
Conclusions: The majority of device embolizations after LAA closure occurs early. A percutaneous approach is often the preferred method for a first rescue attempt. Major adverse event rates, including death, are high particularly if the first retrieval attempt was unsuccessful.
Condensed abstract: This dedicated multicenter registry examined timing, management, and clinical outcome of device embolization. Early embolization (70.4 %) was most frequent. As a first rescue attempt, percutaneous retrieval was preferred in 75.0 %, followed by surgical removal (21.3 %). In patients with a second retrieval attempt a higher mortality (death first attempt: 2.9 % vs. death second attempt: 24.1 %, p < 0.001) was observed. Mortality (10.2 %) and the major complication rate after device embolization were high.