3 16

Cited 0 times in

An international consensus panel on the potential value of Digital Surgery

Authors
 Jamie Erskine  ;  Payam Abrishami  ;  Jean-Christophe Bernhard  ;  Richard Charter  ;  Richard Culbertson  ;  Jo Carol Hiatt  ;  Ataru Igarashi  ;  Gretchen Purcell Jackson  ;  Matthew Lien  ;  Guy Maddern  ;  Joseph Soon Yau Ng  ;  Anita Patel  ;  Koon Ho Rha  ;  Prasanna Sooriakumaran  ;  Scott Tackett  ;  Giuseppe Turchetti  ;  Anastasia Chalkidou 
Citation
 BMJ OPEN, Vol.14(9) : e082875, 2024-09 
Journal Title
BMJ OPEN
Issue Date
2024-09
MeSH
Consensus ; Delphi Technique ; Digital Technology ; Humans ; Surgery, Computer-Assisted* / methods ; Surgical Procedures, Operative / standards ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Technology Assessment, Biomedical
Keywords
ehealth ; health economics ; health informatics ; quality in health care ; surgery
Abstract
Objectives: The use of digital technology in surgery is increasing rapidly, with a wide array of new applications from presurgical planning to postsurgical performance assessment. Understanding the clinical and economic value of these technologies is vital for making appropriate health policy and purchasing decisions. We explore the potential value of digital technologies in surgery and produce expert consensus on how to assess this value.

Design: A modified Delphi and consensus conference approach was adopted. Delphi rounds were used to generate priority topics and consensus statements for discussion.

Setting and participants: An international panel of 14 experts was assembled, representing relevant stakeholder groups: clinicians, health economists, health technology assessment experts, policy-makers and industry.

Primary and secondary outcome measures: A scoping questionnaire was used to generate research questions to be answered. A second questionnaire was used to rate the importance of these research questions. A final questionnaire was used to generate statements for discussion during three consensus conferences. After discussion, the panel voted on their level of agreement from 1 to 9; where 1=strongly disagree and 9=strongly agree. Consensus was defined as a mean level of agreement of >7.

Results: Four priority topics were identified: (1) how data are used in digital surgery, (2) the existing evidence base for digital surgical technologies, (3) how digital technologies may assist surgical training and education and (4) methods for the assessment of these technologies. Seven consensus statements were generated and refined, with the final level of consensus ranging from 7.1 to 8.6.

Conclusion: Potential benefits of digital technologies in surgery include reducing unwarranted variation in surgical practice, increasing access to surgery and reducing health inequalities. Assessments to consider the value of the entire surgical ecosystem holistically are critical, especially as many digital technologies are likely to interact simultaneously in the operating theatre.
Files in This Item:
T992025447.pdf Download
DOI
10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082875
Appears in Collections:
1. College of Medicine (의과대학) > Dept. of Urology (비뇨의학교실) > 1. Journal Papers
Yonsei Authors
Rha, Koon Ho(나군호) ORCID logo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8588-7584
URI
https://ir.ymlib.yonsei.ac.kr/handle/22282913/206403
사서에게 알리기
  feedback

qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Browse

Links